In a landmark ruling, the Allahabad High Court held that land acquisitions made under the U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965, which were not finalized by January 1, 2014, are governed by the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and Resettlement Act, 2013 (LARR Act, 2013). This ruling significantly impacts the determination of compensation for landowners, ensuring that they receive fair compensation based on the updated law. Here is a detailed summary and analysis of the judgment and its implications:
Background and Legislative Framework
The U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965, provides a framework for land acquisition by the U.P. Housing and Development Board (Parishad). Section 55 of this Adhiniyam incorporates provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for acquiring land. However, the introduction of the LARR Act, 2013, brought significant changes to land acquisition laws, particularly in terms of compensation and rehabilitation of affected landowners.
Section 24 of the LARR Act, 2013, states that if an award for land acquisition under the previous Act has not been made before the new Act came into force, the provisions of the new Act would apply. This section aims to ensure that landowners receive fair compensation and rehabilitation benefits under the more beneficial provisions of the new law.
Case Details and Petitioner’s Arguments
The petitioner in this case was a landowner whose land was notified for acquisition under the Adhiniyam in 1979. Despite the notification and subsequent possession by the Parishad in 2002, the award determining compensation was only passed in February 2024. The petitioner argued that since the award was delayed beyond the commencement of the LARR Act, 2013, the compensation should be determined under the new Act, which offers higher compensation and better rehabilitation terms.
Parishad’s Counter-Arguments
The Parishad contended that the acquisition process was governed by the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as incorporated into the Adhiniyam. They argued that the provisions of the LARR Act, 2013, were not applicable to acquisitions under the Adhiniyam, as the new Act had not been explicitly incorporated into it.
High Court’s Analysis and Verdict
The Allahabad High Court, comprising Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta and Justice Kshitij Shailendra, examined the legislative intent and judicial precedents to determine the applicability of the LARR Act, 2013. The court relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Jainul Islam and Another, which held that beneficial amendments to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, would apply to acquisitions under the Adhiniyam to avoid arbitrariness and discrimination.
The High Court observed that the LARR Act, 2013, replaced the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and its provisions should apply to ongoing acquisitions to ensure fairness. The court noted that the delay in passing the award by the Parishad, which spanned over four decades, resulted in unfair compensation based on outdated land values.
Constitutional Considerations
The court emphasized that applying the provisions of the LARR Act, 2013, was necessary to uphold the principles of Article 14 of the Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law. The court highlighted that landowners affected by acquisitions under different statutes should not be subjected to differential treatment, especially when it comes to compensation and rehabilitation.
Implications of the Ruling
This ruling has profound implications for land acquisition cases in Uttar Pradesh. It ensures that landowners whose acquisitions were not finalized before January 1, 2014, are entitled to fair compensation under the LARR Act, 2013. This includes:
- Enhanced Compensation: Landowners will receive compensation based on the market value at the time of the award, along with solatium and interest as prescribed under the LARR Act, 2013.
- Rehabilitation and Resettlement Benefits: Affected landowners will be entitled to comprehensive rehabilitation and resettlement benefits, ensuring their socio-economic well-being post-acquisition.
- Timely Awards: The ruling mandates timely determination and disbursement of compensation, preventing undue delays that disadvantage landowners.
Conclusion
The Allahabad High Court’s decision underscores the importance of fair and transparent processes in land acquisition. By applying the provisions of the LARR Act, 2013, to acquisitions under the U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965, the court has ensured that landowners receive just compensation and rehabilitation benefits. This ruling aligns with the broader objectives of the LARR Act, 2013, promoting fairness, transparency, and justice in land acquisition processes.
This decision sets a precedent for similar cases, reinforcing the principle that legislative changes aimed at providing fair compensation should be applied retrospectively to ongoing acquisitions. It highlights the judiciary's role in protecting the rights of landowners and ensuring that statutory benefits reach those they are intended to protect. The ruling also serves as a reminder to government bodies to expedite the acquisition process and comply with legal mandates to avoid prolonged litigation and ensure justice for affected landowners.
.jpeg)
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.