Hoteliers in Mandarmani, a prominent tourist destination in West Bengal, have petitioned the Calcutta High Court to challenge a demolition order issued by the District Magistrate. The order, affecting nearly 140 establishments, was based on allegations of illegal constructions violating Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) guidelines. This case presents a complex intersection of environmental protection, tourism-driven economic interests, and legal compliance.
Background of the Mandarmani Case
Mandarmani, known for its serene beaches and growing tourism industry, has witnessed significant commercial development over the past two decades. However, this rapid growth has raised concerns over environmental sustainability. The National Green Tribunal (NGT), in its 2022 ruling, flagged extensive violations of CRZ norms, particularly by hotels and resorts constructed in no-development zones.
Following the tribunal's order, the District Magistrate initiated demolition proceedings against the alleged violators, citing non-compliance with ecological guidelines. The move has sparked widespread discontent among hoteliers, who argue that their constructions were approved by local authorities. They also emphasize the potential socio-economic fallout of the demolitions on the region's economy.
Petitioners' Arguments
The hoteliers contest the demolition order on several grounds:
Validity of Approvals: Many hoteliers claim that their establishments were built with permissions from the local administrative bodies. They assert that these approvals were granted based on earlier demarcations, which may have changed over time without proper communication or due process.
Economic Impact: The petitioners highlight that the demolition of nearly 140 hotels would cripple the local tourism industry, which is a primary source of livelihood for residents. They argue that such drastic measures would result in job losses, reduced income for allied businesses, and a decline in tourist footfall.
Procedural Lapses: The hoteliers allege that the demolition orders were issued without adequate notice or opportunity to present their case. They question the transparency of the process and the absence of alternative solutions to address the violations.
Environmental Responsibility: Some petitioners contend that they have adopted eco-friendly measures to minimize their environmental impact. They argue for a more collaborative approach to resolving the issue, rather than blanket demolitions.
Environmental Concerns and CRZ Guidelines
The CRZ guidelines, established under the Environment Protection Act, 1986, aim to regulate activities in coastal areas to protect marine ecosystems and prevent unplanned urbanization. The guidelines prohibit construction within a specific distance from the high tide line in designated no-development zones.
The NGT's 2022 order highlighted the ecological damage caused by unregulated construction in Mandarmani. It criticized local authorities for failing to enforce CRZ norms and permitting commercial establishments in sensitive zones. The tribunal directed the authorities to take immediate corrective measures, leading to the current dispute.
The Role of Local Authorities
The controversy also raises questions about the role of local governance in enforcing CRZ regulations. Petitioners argue that their constructions were approved by local bodies, which failed to adhere to national guidelines. This points to a systemic issue of overlapping jurisdictions and inconsistent enforcement of environmental laws.
Legal and Economic Implications
The case underscores the broader challenge of balancing environmental conservation with economic development. Coastal tourism hubs like Mandarmani rely heavily on infrastructure to attract visitors, but unchecked development risks long-term ecological harm.
From a legal perspective, the High Court's decision will set a precedent for addressing similar disputes in other coastal regions. The case also highlights the need for a unified framework to reconcile local and national regulatory priorities.
Way Forward
To resolve the impasse, stakeholders must explore collaborative solutions:
Regularization Measures: Authorities could consider regularizing structures that meet certain environmental standards, rather than resorting to outright demolition.
Revised Zoning Policies: Clear demarcation of CRZ zones, coupled with regular updates and communication to stakeholders, can prevent future disputes.
Sustainable Tourism Practices: Encouraging eco-friendly practices among hoteliers can help strike a balance between economic and environmental interests.
Conclusion
The Calcutta High Court's deliberations in this case will have far-reaching implications for coastal governance in India. The Mandarmani hoteliers' plea highlights the tensions between development and sustainability, underscoring the importance of equitable and transparent regulatory frameworks. The outcome will likely influence how India navigates the challenges of balancing ecological preservation with economic growth in its coastal regions.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.