On December 23, 2024, the Telangana High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of veteran actor Mohan Babu, who is implicated in an alleged assault on a TV9 journalist. Justice K. Lakshman presided over the case, emphasizing the gravity of the allegations and the ongoing nature of the investigation.
The incident in question occurred on December 10, when the complainant, a journalist from TV9, visited Mohan Babu's residence for news coverage. According to the complainant, Babu's son, Manchu Manoj, invited him and other media personnel into the farmhouse to cover a news story. Once inside, the journalist alleges that upon questioning Babu, the actor reacted violently by seizing the TV9 microphone—a stainless steel device—and striking him near the left eye and under the ear, resulting in severe injuries that necessitated surgery.
In his ruling, Justice Lakshman noted the serious nature of the allegations, highlighting that the complainant sustained grievous injuries requiring surgical intervention. The court expressed concern over potential interference with the investigation, citing specific allegations that Babu attempted to influence the complainant to withdraw the complaint. Given these considerations, the court found it inappropriate to grant anticipatory bail at this stage, emphasizing the need for an unhindered investigative process.
This legal setback for Mohan Babu follows a series of recent controversies involving the actor. Earlier in December, the High Court had directed local police to monitor Babu's residence every two hours. This directive came after Babu alleged that his younger son had made multiple attempts to evict him from his property, creating an unsafe environment. The court also instructed the Hyderabad Police Commissionerate and the Additional District Magistrate of Rachakonda not to compel Babu's presence in response to a show-cause notice issued under Section 126 of the BNS.
The denial of anticipatory bail means that Mohan Babu remains vulnerable to arrest as the investigation proceeds. The court's decision underscores the seriousness with which it views allegations of this nature, particularly when they involve attempts to obstruct justice. As the investigation continues, it remains to be seen how these legal challenges will impact Babu's career and public image.
This case also brings to light broader concerns regarding the safety of journalists and the challenges they face in the line of duty. The alleged assault on a media professional by a prominent public figure raises questions about press freedom and the protections afforded to journalists in India. The outcome of this case could have implications for how similar incidents are addressed in the future, potentially influencing both legal standards and public discourse surrounding the treatment of media personnel.
In conclusion, the Telangana High Court's decision to deny anticipatory bail to Mohan Babu reflects the judiciary's commitment to allowing a thorough and unobstructed investigation into serious allegations of assault and interference with justice. As the legal process unfolds, it will not only determine the personal and professional repercussions for Babu but may also contribute to the ongoing dialogue about the safety and rights of journalists in the country.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.