Understanding 'Protected Teachers'
Under the Kerala Education Rules (KER), a 'protected teacher' is defined as an educator who has been retrenched due to the lack of vacancies after serving a specified length of regular service, as determined by the government. Rule 6(viii) of Chapter V of KER mandates that every school must absorb qualified teachers or non-teaching staff eligible for protection as per government orders.
Case Background
The case in question involved a petitioner appointed as a High School Assistant (Hindi) at Mary Matha High School, Panthalampadam, in 2008. The District Education Officer (DEO) rejected the approval of this appointment, citing the necessity to fill the vacancy with a protected teacher. Subsequent appeals to the Deputy Director of Education and a revision petition to the government were also dismissed.
Contentions and Court's Analysis
The DEO argued that, based on a government order, the school was obligated to appoint a protected teacher. However, the petitioner contended that there was no evidence indicating that a list of protected teachers had been sent to the school's manager. The court noted that various circulars from the Director General of Education require the Deputy Director of Education to provide managers with such lists. In the absence of this, the manager cannot be held responsible for not appointing a protected teacher.
Precedent Cases
The court referenced its earlier decisions to support its ruling. In State of Kerala and Others v. Haseena and Another (2013), it was held that managers are obligated to appoint protected teachers only when a list has been sent to them, with no further obligation beyond that. Additionally, in Nadeera T. S. and Another v. State of Kerala and Others (2011), the court observed that there was no provision allowing educational officers to delay the approval of appointments until a protected teacher was appointed, especially in the absence of a prior government order.
Implications of the Ruling
Justice K. Babu emphasized that without filling the vacancy, a manager cannot effectively run the school. While managers have an obligation to appoint protected teachers, this responsibility should not be extended to the point where it denies the approval of a qualified teacher's appointment, particularly when the vacancy arises due to retirement. This ruling ensures that educational institutions can maintain operational efficiency without being hindered by bureaucratic delays.
Conclusion
The Kerala High Court's decision provides clarity on the obligations of aided school managers regarding the appointment of protected teachers. By stipulating that such appointments are mandatory only when an official list is provided, the court balances the need to protect retrenched teachers with the practical requirements of school administration. This judgment is expected to streamline appointment processes and prevent unwarranted delays in filling teaching positions.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.