The Kerala High Court deliberated on the bail application of Boby Chemmanur, a prominent businessman facing allegations of sexual harassment. Justice P. V. Kunhikrishnan presided over the proceedings, during which the court examined the content of a video submitted as evidence. The video featured Chemmanur addressing comments he had previously made about an actress, which were central to the harassment allegations.
Upon reviewing the footage, Justice Kunhikrishnan observed that Chemmanur's remarks appeared to carry a "double meaning," suggesting that the statements could be interpreted in more than one way, potentially with inappropriate connotations. This observation was significant, as it indicated the court's recognition of the potentially objectionable nature of the comments in question.
The prosecution, represented by the Public Prosecutor, opposed the bail request, arguing that granting bail should be accompanied by stringent conditions to prevent any further misconduct. In response, the defense counsel provided a personal undertaking, assuring the court that Chemmanur would refrain from making any objectionable comments on social media platforms during the course of the legal proceedings.
The allegations against Chemmanur stem from an incident during the inauguration of one of his jewelry stores in Kannur, where he is accused of sexually harassing the complainant. Following this event, it is alleged that Chemmanur made additional remarks of a sexually suggestive nature on YouTube and other social media platforms, exacerbating the situation.
Prior to the High Court hearing, Chemmanur's bail application was denied by the Ernakulam Magistrate Court on January 9, 2025, resulting in his remand to 14 days of judicial custody. The charges against him include Section 75 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, pertaining to sexual harassment, and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, which deals with the publishing or transmission of obscene material in electronic form.
The High Court's decision to pass an order on the bail application later that day underscores the complexity and sensitivity of the case. The court must balance the rights of the accused with the need to address serious allegations of sexual harassment, considering both the evidence presented and the assurances provided by the defense.
This case highlights the broader issues of accountability and conduct in both physical and digital spaces, emphasizing the legal system's role in addressing allegations of harassment and the responsibilities of individuals in their public communications. The outcome of the bail application and subsequent legal proceedings will be closely watched, given the prominence of the individuals involved and the serious nature of the allegations.
Case Title: C. D. Boby @ Boby Chemmanur v State of Kerala
Case No: BA 535/2025
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.