Background: Enrollment Procedures and Fee Structures
The enrollment process for aspiring advocates in India is governed by the Advocates Act, 1961. Section 24(1)(f) of the Act stipulates the enrollment fees payable to the State Bar Council and the Bar Council of India (BCI). For general category candidates, the prescribed fees are ₹600 for the State Bar Council and ₹150 for the BCI, totaling ₹750. For candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes, the fees are reduced to ₹100 and ₹25, respectively, totaling ₹125.
In 2017, the BCI issued a directive instructing State Bar Councils to collect an additional ₹2,500 from applicants as a certificate verification fee during enrollment. This directive aimed to ensure the authenticity of applicants' educational qualifications, a measure deemed necessary to maintain the profession's integrity.
Supreme Court's Stance on Verification Fees
The Supreme Court of India has addressed the issue of certificate verification fees in previous judgments. Notably, the Court directed universities and examination boards to verify the authenticity of educational certificates without charging any fees, emphasizing that such verifications should be conducted promptly upon requisition by the respective State Bar Councils. Furthermore, the Supreme Court clarified that State Bar Councils are not authorized to charge any amount beyond the enrollment fees prescribed under Section 24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act.
Case Overview: Challenge Against Additional Verification Fees
The case in question involved a petitioner who sought enrollment with the Bar Council of Kerala. The Single Judge's interim order permitted the petitioner's enrollment, provided he produced receipts for fees paid to verify his SSLC, Plus Two, Degree, and LLB certificates by the concerned authorities and university. Challenging this condition, the petitioner contended that it contravened the Supreme Court's directives, which prohibit the imposition of additional fees for certificate verification.
High Court's Analysis and Judgment
The Division Bench of the Kerala High Court, comprising Justice Ziyad Rahman A. A. and Justice P. V. Balakrishnan, examined the petitioner's contentions alongside the Bar Council's submissions. The Bar Council of Kerala argued that it was acting in accordance with the BCI's 2017 directive to collect ₹2,500 as a verification fee. However, the Court noted that this directive was issued without considering the Supreme Court's explicit instructions against such fees.
The High Court emphasized that, based on the Supreme Court's rulings, universities and examination boards are obligated to verify educational certificates without charging any fees. Additionally, the Court reiterated that the Advocates Act prescribes specific enrollment fees, and any additional charges imposed by the Bar Councils are impermissible. Consequently, the Court held that the BCI's directive to collect ₹2,500 for certificate verification could not be implemented, as it contravened both statutory provisions and Supreme Court directives.
Implications of the Judgment
This judgment has several significant implications:
Adherence to Statutory Provisions: The ruling reinforces the necessity for Bar Councils to operate strictly within the confines of the Advocates Act, 1961, ensuring that no additional fees beyond those prescribed are imposed on applicants.
Compliance with Supreme Court Directives: The judgment underscores the binding nature of Supreme Court directives, particularly concerning the prohibition of additional fees for certificate verification.
Financial Relief for Applicants: By eliminating the ₹2,500 verification fee, the Court's decision reduces the financial burden on aspiring advocates, promoting greater accessibility to the legal profession.
Clarification of Roles and Responsibilities: The judgment delineates the responsibilities of universities, examination boards, and Bar Councils in the certificate verification process, ensuring that applicants are not unjustly charged for mandatory procedures.
Conclusion
The Kerala High Court's ruling serves as a pivotal affirmation of statutory compliance and judicial directives within the legal profession's regulatory framework. By prohibiting the imposition of additional certificate verification fees, the Court has upheld the principles of fairness and accessibility in the enrollment process for aspiring advocates. This judgment not only alleviates the financial burden on applicants but also reinforces the imperative for regulatory bodies to operate within the legal parameters established by the Advocates Act and the Supreme Court of India.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.