In a landmark observation, the Kerala High Court has emphasized that elected representatives who wish to change their political affiliation must first resign from their current position and seek a fresh mandate from the electorate. This pronouncement underscores the court's commitment to preserving the sanctity of the democratic process and ensuring that the will of the people remains paramount.
The Court's Observation
The court stated, "If the elected representative wants to change his policy or political affiliation, he has to resign and face the mandate of the people again. That is the moral side of democracy." This assertion highlights the ethical responsibility of elected officials to honor the trust placed in them by their constituents. Unilaterally shifting political allegiance without seeking public approval is deemed a breach of this trust and an affront to the democratic bond between the electorate and their representative.
Context of the Observation
This significant observation was made during the bail proceedings of five individuals accused of assaulting Kala Raju, a councillor of the Koothattukulam Nagara Sabha. Raju, affiliated with the Left Democratic Front (LDF), was allegedly abducted by members of her own party after she expressed her intention to support a no-confidence motion initiated by the United Democratic Front (UDF). The incident underscores the intense political rivalries and the lengths to which individuals may go to maintain political power.
The Court's Critique of Political Conduct
Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan criticized both the LDF and UDF for attempting to circumvent democratic principles by resorting to unlawful actions. He remarked, "The proper manner by which a person is to be defeated in a democratic set-up is through the ballot papers and not by using weapons or by committing vandalism." This admonition serves as a reminder that the essence of democracy lies in peaceful and lawful processes, and any deviation undermines the very foundation of democratic governance.
Legal Proceedings and Allegations
The accused were alleged to have assaulted Councillor Raju when she arrived at the Nagara Sabha Office to participate in the no-confidence motion. The charges included physical assault and outraging her modesty by pulling her saree. The backdrop of this incident is the fragile majority held by the LDF in the Koothattukulam Nagara Sabha. Raju's potential support for the UDF's no-confidence motion threatened to topple the LDF's control, leading to her alleged abduction by party colleagues. In retaliation, the current assault case was reportedly filed against UDF members, suggesting a tit-for-tat strategy between the rival factions.
Implications for Democratic Processes
The Kerala High Court's observations have far-reaching implications for the political landscape. By asserting that elected representatives must seek a fresh mandate upon changing political affiliations, the court reinforces the principle that the electorate's will is supreme. This stance discourages political defections motivated by personal gain or coercion, promoting stability and integrity within the political system.
The Menace of Political Defection
Political defection, commonly referred to as "party hopping," poses a significant threat to the stability of democratic institutions. When elected representatives switch allegiances without consulting their constituents, it can lead to political instability, erosion of public trust, and policy inconsistency. Such actions often stem from personal ambitions, financial incentives, or external pressures, rather than genuine ideological shifts.
Existing Legal Framework
India's Tenth Schedule, commonly known as the "Anti-Defection Law," was introduced in 1985 to address the issue of political defections. The law specifies the grounds for disqualification of elected members on the basis of defection to another political party. However, despite this legal framework, defections continue to occur, suggesting that the existing provisions may not be stringent enough to deter such actions.
Calls for Reform
Recognizing the limitations of the current anti-defection laws, there have been calls for more stringent measures. The Kerala High Court, in a previous judgment, highlighted the need for imposing stringent financial penalties on defectors. The court observed that financial disincentives might serve as a more effective deterrent against defection, as the current consequences often do not impose a significant burden on the defectors.
The Moral Imperative
Beyond legal reforms, there is a moral dimension to the issue of political defection. Elected representatives are entrusted with a mandate from the people, and altering their political stance without seeking renewed approval is a breach of this trust. The Kerala High Court's recent observation underscores this moral obligation, emphasizing that the ethical course of action for a representative desiring to change affiliation is to resign and contest a fresh election.
Conclusion
The Kerala High Court's pronouncement serves as a crucial reminder of the ethical and democratic principles that should guide political conduct. By advocating for elected representatives to seek a fresh mandate upon changing political affiliations, the court reinforces the sanctity of the voter-representative relationship. This stance not only upholds the integrity of the democratic process but also seeks to restore public faith in the political system, ensuring that the will of the people remains the cornerstone of governance.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.