In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court has declared that the Uttar Pradesh government's failure to appoint teaching and non-teaching staff in state-run schools constitutes a clear violation of Article 21-A of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the fundamental right to free and compulsory education for children aged six to fourteen. Justice Prakash Padia emphasized that this constitutional mandate cannot be fulfilled without the adequate appointment of Assistant Teachers and Headmasters in primary schools.
The case originated from a writ petition filed by a junior high school facing prolonged vacancies in key positions, including Headmaster, Assistant Teachers, a Clerk, and Class-IV employees, since June 2022. Despite repeated appeals to the education authorities, the institution received no substantive response, severely impacting the quality of education provided to its students.
During a hearing on December 10, 2024, the Court expressed deep concern over the state's inaction, noting that the large number of unfilled teaching positions was compromising educational standards across Uttar Pradesh. The Court highlighted that no tangible progress had been made to address the issue, despite multiple directives and discussions.
Subsequently, on January 31, 2025, the Court was informed that the state government had sent several letters to the Director General of School Education, Uttar Pradesh, seeking a comprehensive proposal to expedite the appointment process. However, no such proposal had been forwarded, prompting the Court to demand an explanation for the delay.
In response, the Director General submitted a letter dated February 13, 2025, which the Court found unsatisfactory. The letter failed to provide a concrete plan or timeline for filling the vacancies, leading the Court to question the commitment of the education authorities to uphold the constitutional rights of students.
On February 17, 2025, the Court directed the Additional Secretary of UP Basic Education to file a personal affidavit within ten days, explaining why action should not be taken against the responsible officials for violating Article 21-A. Justice Padia underscored that the state's duty to provide free and compulsory education includes the prompt appointment of qualified teachers, without which the fundamental right remains unfulfilled.
The Court's ruling serves as a stern reminder to the Uttar Pradesh government of its constitutional obligations. The persistent vacancies not only undermine the quality of education but also erode public trust in the state's commitment to its citizens' rights. The upcoming hearing, scheduled for February 27, 2025, is expected to bring further scrutiny to the actions of the education department and may result in stringent measures to ensure compliance with constitutional mandates.
This case highlights the critical importance of administrative accountability in the education sector. The judiciary's proactive stance reinforces the principle that fundamental rights are not merely aspirational but require concrete actions from the state to be realized. As the situation develops, it remains imperative for the Uttar Pradesh government to take immediate and effective steps to address the staffing shortages in its schools, thereby honoring its constitutional duty to provide quality education to all children.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.