Background of the Case
In a significant ruling, the Punjab & Haryana High Court addressed the case of Narinder Kaur, an Elementary Teacher Training (E.T.T.) educator at Government Primary School Sodhi Nagar in Ferozepur. Kaur commenced her tenure on September 11, 2016. Tragically, on March 8, 2017, while en route to her school, she was involved in a severe accident that resulted in a 90% permanent disability, rendering her bedridden and entirely dependent on her family for daily activities. Due to her incapacitation, she was unable to continue her teaching duties, leading to an extended medical leave without salary from the date of the accident. Consequently, her probation period remained incomplete, further complicating her employment status. The District Education Officer of Ferozepur, recognizing her plight, recommended to the Director of the Education Department on December 27, 2021, that her salary be released on compassionate grounds. This recommendation was based on guidelines from the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance, and Pension, which advocate for financial support to government employees who become incapacitated during their service. Despite this, the authorities denied her request, prompting Kaur to file a writ petition seeking the release of her salary and other admissible benefits from the date of her accident.
Legal Framework: Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995
Central to the court's deliberation was Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995. This provision mandates that if an employee acquires a disability during their service, the employer is obligated to shift them to another post with the same pay scale and service benefits. If accommodating the employee in another post is not feasible, the employer must create a supernumerary post to ensure the employee continues to receive their salary and benefits until the age of superannuation. This legislative framework underscores the state's commitment to safeguarding the rights and dignity of employees who become disabled during their tenure.
Court's Observations and Judgment
Justice Aman Chaudhary, presiding over the case, emphasized the duty of employers to be sensitive to the hardships faced by employees who suffer debilitating injuries during their service. The court criticized the state's lack of empathy and proactive support in Kaur's situation, noting that as a welfare state, it should have taken measures to alleviate her suffering. The court referenced the case of Ram Kumar vs. State of Haryana and others, which dealt with a similar scenario where an employee became 100% disabled due to a road accident and was denied salary. In that case, the court ruled in favor of the employee, directing the release of all arrears of salary along with consequential benefits. Drawing parallels, the court in Kaur's case held that the respondents were obligated to release all arrears of salary and benefits due to her. Furthermore, the court ruled that since the state had retained and utilized funds rightfully belonging to Kaur, she was entitled to interest on the withheld amounts. This decision reinforces the principle that employees who acquire disabilities during their service are entitled to continued financial support, either through reassignment or the creation of supernumerary positions, ensuring they receive their rightful dues up to the point of superannuation.
Implications of the Judgment
This ruling has far-reaching implications for the rights of disabled employees within the public sector. It reaffirms the legal protections afforded to employees who become disabled during their service, emphasizing the employer's duty to provide continued financial support and suitable employment accommodations. The judgment also highlights the importance of timely and compassionate responses from employers, particularly in the public sector, to the needs of disabled employees. By mandating the payment of interest on withheld salaries, the court sends a clear message that delays and insensitivity in addressing the legitimate claims of disabled employees will not be tolerated. This decision serves as a precedent, reinforcing the legal and moral obligations of employers to uphold the rights and dignity of employees who face unforeseen disabilities during their tenure.
Conclusion
The Punjab & Haryana High Court's decision in favor of Narinder Kaur underscores the judiciary's role in protecting the rights of employees who acquire disabilities during their service. By enforcing the provisions of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, the court has ensured that such employees are not left without support and are provided with the necessary financial and occupational accommodations. This judgment serves as a reminder to employers, especially within the public sector, of their obligations towards employees who face life-altering challenges during their service.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.