In a significant ruling, the Rajasthan High Court emphasized the necessity for both state and private employers to conclude departmental inquiries against employees within a reasonable timeframe, ideally within six months. This directive aims to uphold the principles of natural justice and prevent undue delays that can adversely affect employees' careers and well-being.
Case Background
The court's decision arose from a petition concerning a disciplinary proceeding initiated in 2011. An inquiry report was submitted in 2014; however, the disciplinary authority had yet to issue a final order, even as the petitioner retired in 2025. Justice Arun Monga, presiding over the case, described the situation as a "glaring example of negligence on the part of the State Instrumentalities" and a "shocking state of affairs." He underscored the prolonged delay as a violation of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control, and Appeal) Rules, 1958, which mandate prompt action by disciplinary authorities upon receiving inquiry reports.
Legal Precedents and Observations
The court referenced the Supreme Court's judgment in Prem Nath Bali v. Registrar, High Court of Delhi and Ors., which highlighted the employer's duty to expedite departmental inquiries, especially when the employee is under suspension. Justice Monga noted that delays not only contravene principles of natural justice but also lead to prolonged litigation, further burdening the judicial system. He emphasized that unresolved inquiries can cause significant hardship to employees, affecting their morale, reputation, and financial stability.
Directive to Employers
Justice Monga asserted that all employers must make sincere efforts to conclude departmental inquiries within six months. If unavoidable circumstances prevent this, an extension may be granted, provided it is reasonable and justified based on the inquiry's nature and complexity. He further directed the Secretary of the State of Rajasthan to instruct all state departments to establish mechanisms ensuring the swift completion of such inquiries.
Implications of the Ruling
This judgment reinforces the importance of timely justice in employment matters. By mandating a six-month timeframe, the court seeks to protect employees from indefinite uncertainty and potential prejudice arising from protracted disciplinary proceedings. The ruling also serves as a reminder to employers about their responsibility to uphold procedural fairness and efficiency in handling disciplinary matters.
Conclusion
The Rajasthan High Court's decision underscores the critical need for promptness in concluding departmental inquiries. It balances the interests of employers in maintaining discipline with the rights of employees to fair and timely resolution of allegations against them. This ruling is expected to set a precedent, encouraging both public and private sector employers to review and, if necessary, reform their disciplinary procedures to prevent undue delays.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.