On April 17, 2025, the Bombay High Court addressed critical concerns regarding the accessibility of bus stops for persons with disabilities. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice MS Karnik directed the State Advisory Board on Disability to promptly consider grievances related to accessibility at bus stops and take appropriate actions to address them. This directive emerged from the court's hearing of a suo motu petition alongside a public interest litigation (PIL) focusing on the challenges faced by differently-abled individuals in navigating public transportation infrastructure.
Background of the Case
The court was simultaneously hearing a suo motu petition and a PIL filed by the organization 'Access to Hope.' The suo motu petition originated from concerns about bollards installed at the entrances of footpaths, which impeded access for disabled individuals. In response, the Bombay Municipal Corporation (BMC) informed the court that it had removed all such bollards and assured that individuals could approach the Assistant Commissioner of the local ward office for any related grievances.
The PIL filed by 'Access to Hope' sought the implementation of the 'Harmonised Guidelines and Space Standards for Barrier Free Built Environment, 2021,' particularly concerning bus stops and terminals in Mumbai. These guidelines mandate at least one accessible route from the bus stand's boarding and alighting points to the walkway leading to the accessible building entrance. They also outline standards for the location, seating, shelter, and other aspects of bus stops to ensure accessibility for all individuals, including those with disabilities.
Court's Observations and Directives
During the hearing, the BMC reiterated that it had removed all bollards at footpath entrances that were causing obstructions to differently-abled individuals. The State government also submitted that a State Advisory Board on Disability had been constituted and had convened meetings to discuss policies benefiting disabled individuals. The minutes of these meetings were placed on record before the court.
In light of these developments, the court directed the State Advisory Board to expeditiously consider the grievances raised in the PIL regarding accessibility at bus stops. The bench emphasized that any aggrieved person could approach the State Advisory Board with their concerns. With these observations, the court disposed of the petitions, signaling a move towards administrative resolution of the issues highlighted.
Significance of the 'Harmonised Guidelines and Space Standards for Barrier Free Built Environment, 2021'
The 'Harmonised Guidelines and Space Standards for Barrier Free Built Environment, 2021' play a pivotal role in ensuring that public infrastructure is accessible to all individuals, regardless of physical abilities. These guidelines provide comprehensive standards for designing and constructing public spaces, including transportation hubs like bus stops, to accommodate the needs of persons with disabilities.
By seeking the implementation of these guidelines, the PIL aimed to address systemic barriers that hinder the mobility and independence of differently-abled individuals. The court's directive to the State Advisory Board underscores the importance of adhering to these standards to create an inclusive and equitable public transportation system.
Role of the State Advisory Board on Disability
The State Advisory Board on Disability serves as a crucial body for formulating and monitoring policies related to the welfare of persons with disabilities. Its responsibilities include advising the government on measures to promote accessibility, reviewing existing policies, and addressing grievances raised by disabled individuals.
In this context, the court's directive places the onus on the Advisory Board to actively engage with the concerns raised in the PIL and ensure that appropriate measures are taken to enhance accessibility at bus stops. This approach reflects a collaborative effort between the judiciary and administrative bodies to uphold the rights of persons with disabilities.
Conclusion
The Bombay High Court's intervention in addressing accessibility issues at bus stops marks a significant step towards promoting inclusivity in public transportation. By directing the State Advisory Board on Disability to consider and act upon the grievances of differently-abled individuals, the court has emphasized the need for proactive administrative measures to dismantle barriers faced by persons with disabilities. The implementation of the 'Harmonised Guidelines and Space Standards for Barrier Free Built Environment, 2021' stands as a testament to the commitment towards creating a more accessible and equitable society.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.