In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has addressed the tenure of Muslim members from State Bar Councils serving on State Waqf Boards. The Court clarified that such members' terms on the Waqf Board are intrinsically linked to their tenure on the Bar Council. Once their term with the Bar Council concludes, their membership on the Waqf Board also ceases.
This decision arose from a case concerning the interpretation of Section 14(1)(b)(iv) of the Waqf Act, 1995. This section pertains to the composition of the Waqf Board, specifically the inclusion of a Muslim member from the State Bar Council. The central question was whether such a member's tenure on the Waqf Board should be fixed or should correspond with their term on the Bar Council.
The Court emphasized that the legislative intent behind Section 14(1)(b)(iv) was to ensure that the Waqf Board benefits from the expertise of a current Muslim member of the State Bar Council. Therefore, it would be inconsistent with this intent to allow a former Bar Council member to continue serving on the Waqf Board after their term has ended. The Court stated that the provision clearly indicates that the Waqf Board member must be a serving Muslim member of the State Bar Council.
Furthermore, the Court addressed the scenario where there is no serving Muslim member on the State Bar Council. In such cases, the position on the Waqf Board reserved for a Muslim Bar Council member would remain vacant until a suitable candidate is available. This approach ensures adherence to the statutory requirement and maintains the integrity of the Waqf Board's composition.
The ruling underscores the importance of aligning the composition of statutory bodies like the Waqf Board with the current status of their members in related institutions. By linking the tenure of Waqf Board members to their active service on the Bar Council, the Court aims to uphold the purpose of the Waqf Act and ensure that the Board benefits from the current expertise and representation intended by the legislation.
This decision has broader implications for the governance of Waqf Boards across India. It sets a precedent that members appointed to the Waqf Board from other statutory bodies must maintain their primary positions to continue serving on the Board. This ensures that the Waqf Board remains a dynamic and representative institution, reflecting the current composition of the bodies from which its members are drawn.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court's clarification reinforces the principle that appointments to statutory bodies like the Waqf Board are contingent upon the appointee's current status in their primary institution. This ensures that such boards remain representative and function in accordance with the legislative intent, maintaining their relevance and effectiveness in governance.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.