Recent Topic

10/recent/ticker-posts

About Me

Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Necessity of Practical Training in Medical Education, Denies Permanent Registration to Foreign Medical Graduates

 

Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Necessity of Practical Training in Medical Education, Denies Permanent Registration to Foreign Medical Graduates

The Andhra Pradesh High Court recently rendered a significant judgment emphasizing the indispensable role of practical training in medical education. The court dismissed a writ petition filed by foreign medical graduates who sought permanent registration to practice medicine in India, despite having completed their internships. Justice Kiranmayee Mandava, presiding over the case, underscored that the medical profession necessitates hands-on experience, which cannot be substituted by online classes.

The petitioners, having pursued their MBBS degrees from foreign institutions, had qualified for admission based on their NEET scores. Post-graduation, they cleared the Foreign Medical Graduate Examination (FMGE) conducted by the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences and obtained the requisite Screening Test Pass certificates. Subsequently, they were allotted internships in Indian medical colleges, which they completed. Upon completion, they applied for permanent registration certificates from the Andhra Pradesh Medical Council. However, the council withheld the issuance of these certificates, citing ongoing verification processes.

The petitioners argued that they had fulfilled all necessary requirements, including the completion of a one-year internship as mandated by the National Medical Commission's circular dated May 9, 2023. They contended that the council's refusal to grant permanent registration was unjustified, especially since they had adhered to all stipulated guidelines and procedures.

In contrast, the Andhra Pradesh Medical Council maintained that, according to the circulars issued by the National Medical Commission, the stages of medical education designed to impart the required practical training could not be overlooked. The council emphasized that the medical profession requires comprehensive clinical training, including skills development, dissections in laboratories to understand human anatomy, patient interactions, and team-based learning exercises such as case studies and problem-solving sessions. These components are integral to medical education and cannot be effectively delivered through online classes.

Justice Mandava concurred with the council's stance, highlighting that the essence of medical training lies in its practical aspects. She noted that the petitioners were instructed to continue their internships at their allotted medical colleges and hospitals until further orders from the Andhra Pradesh Medical Council. The judge emphasized that, in light of the Government of India's circulars on the issue, the stages of medical education designed to impart the required practical training cannot be disregarded.

The court's decision underscores the critical importance of hands-on experience in the medical field. While theoretical knowledge forms the foundation of medical education, it is the practical application of this knowledge that equips medical professionals to handle real-world scenarios effectively. The ruling serves as a reminder that the integrity and quality of medical training must be upheld to ensure the safety and well-being of patients.

This judgment also reflects the judiciary's recognition of the unique demands of the medical profession. By affirming the necessity of practical training, the court reinforces the principle that medical education cannot be compromised, even in the face of challenges posed by circumstances such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The decision sets a precedent for maintaining rigorous standards in medical training, ensuring that future medical practitioners are well-prepared to meet the complexities of healthcare delivery.

In conclusion, the Andhra Pradesh High Court's ruling highlights the irreplaceable value of practical training in medical education. By denying the petitioners' plea for permanent registration without the requisite hands-on experience, the court upholds the standards essential for competent medical practice. This decision reinforces the commitment to patient safety and the delivery of high-quality healthcare services.

WhatsApp Group Invite

Join WhatsApp Community

Post a Comment

0 Comments

'; (function() { var dsq = document.createElement('script'); dsq.type = 'text/javascript'; dsq.async = true; dsq.src = '//' + disqus_shortname + '.disqus.com/embed.js'; (document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(dsq); })();