The Bombay High Court has recently expressed significant concern regarding the growing trend of misuse of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act). In a notable judgment, the court highlighted instances where estranged wives have been filing complaints not only against their husbands but also against distant relatives who do not share a domestic relationship with them. This practice, the court observed, appears to be aimed at causing harassment and exerting undue pressure on the estranged husbands.
Justice R.M. Joshi, presiding over the Aurangabad Bench, addressed a case involving a woman who had filed a complaint under the DV Act against her husband and several of his relatives, including two brothers-in-law and a sister-in-law. The relatives, represented by Advocate G.J. Kore, contended that they did not share a domestic relationship with the complainant, as they resided separately and had never lived together in a shared household. The court concurred with this argument, emphasizing that for a complaint under the DV Act to be maintainable, there must be a domestic relationship, which necessitates living together in a shared household.
The court's judgment underscored that the DV Act is designed to protect individuals in domestic relationships from abuse and violence. However, the inclusion of distant relatives who have never cohabited with the complainant dilutes the intent of the legislation and can lead to unwarranted harassment. Justice Joshi noted that this trend of naming non-cohabiting relatives as respondents is becoming increasingly common and is often used as a tactic to pressure the husband.
In this particular case, the court found that the complainant's allegations against the distant relatives lacked the necessary foundation of a domestic relationship. The relatives lived in different cities and had no history of residing with the complainant. Consequently, the court quashed the proceedings against them, reiterating that the DV Act's provisions should not be misapplied to individuals who do not fall within its defined scope.
This judgment serves as a critical reminder of the importance of adhering to the legal definitions and boundaries established by the DV Act. While the Act plays a vital role in safeguarding individuals from domestic abuse, its misuse can undermine its credibility and effectiveness. The court's decision aims to prevent the dilution of the Act's purpose and to ensure that it is applied judiciously and fairly.
The Bombay High Court's observations call for a more discerning approach when filing complaints under the DV Act. It emphasizes the necessity for complainants to establish a clear domestic relationship with the respondents to maintain the integrity of the legal process. By addressing the misuse of the Act, the court seeks to uphold the rights of genuine victims while protecting individuals from unwarranted legal harassment.
This ruling also highlights the need for legal practitioners and the judiciary to vigilantly assess the merits of DV Act complaints, ensuring that only those cases that meet the statutory requirements proceed. Such diligence is essential to maintain public confidence in the legal system and to prevent the erosion of protections intended for actual victims of domestic violence.
In conclusion, the Bombay High Court's judgment serves as a pivotal step in addressing the concerns surrounding the misuse of the Domestic Violence Act. It reinforces the necessity of a domestic relationship for the Act's applicability and cautions against the inclusion of distant relatives in complaints without substantiated grounds. This decision aims to preserve the Act's integrity and to ensure that it continues to serve its intended purpose of protecting individuals from genuine instances of domestic abuse.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.