The Jammu and Kashmir High Court has taken decisive action by canceling the license of Advocate Sajad Ahmad Shah after discovering that he had obtained his enrollment using a fraudulent LL.B degree. This significant development underscores the judiciary's commitment to upholding the integrity of the legal profession.
Sajad Ahmad Shah, a resident of Srinagar, had been practicing law since 2010 after enrolling with the Bar Council of Jammu and Kashmir. However, recent investigations revealed that the law degree he submitted at the time of his enrollment was neither authentic nor valid. The High Court's Admission and Enrollment Committee conducted a thorough inquiry into the matter, culminating in a resolution passed on April 29, 2025, recommending the revocation of Shah's license.
Following this recommendation, the Registrar General (Officiating), M.K. Sharma, issued an official notification on May 13, 2025, stating that Shah's certificate of enrollment was revoked with immediate effect due to the submission of a "fake and forged LL.B degree." Consequently, his name has been removed from the Roll of Advocates maintained by the Bar Council of Jammu and Kashmir.
The High Court has ensured that this decision is communicated to all relevant judicial and administrative bodies. Notifications have been sent to the Bar Council of India, the Supreme Court Registry, and judicial officers across the Union Territories of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. This comprehensive dissemination aims to prevent any further professional engagements by Shah under the guise of legitimate legal credentials.
This incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of verifying academic qualifications and maintaining ethical standards within the legal community. The High Court's proactive measures highlight its dedication to preserving the sanctity of the legal profession and ensuring that only individuals with genuine qualifications are permitted to practice law.
The revocation of Shah's license after 16 years of practice also raises concerns about the efficacy of existing verification processes during the enrollment of advocates. It underscores the need for more stringent checks and balances to detect and prevent such discrepancies at the earliest stages.
In conclusion, the Jammu and Kashmir High Court's action against Advocate Sajad Ahmad Shah reinforces the judiciary's unwavering stance against fraudulent practices. It sends a clear message that the legal system will not tolerate any compromise on the authenticity of qualifications and the ethical conduct of its practitioners. This move is expected to bolster public confidence in the legal profession and serve as a deterrent against similar malpractices in the future.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.