The Manipur High Court has issued a landmark decision affirming the right of transgender individuals to have their corrected name and gender updated in all educational and professional documents. The ruling emerged from a case brought by Dr. Beoncy Laishram, recognized as Northeast India’s first transgender woman doctor, who sought to align her academic and medical records with her legally recognized identity.
Born 'Boboi Laishram', the petitioner underwent gender reassignment surgery in 2019 and subsequently obtained updated official identity documents—such as Aadhaar, voter identification, and PAN—reflecting her new name and gender. Despite having these updated documents, she encountered resistance from educational boards, universities, and professional councils when requesting corrected certificates reflecting her identity change. These authorities declined to issue new documents, citing the absence of specific provisions in their institutional regulations to permit such changes.
Justice A. Guneshwar Sharma, presiding over the case, emphatically ruled that institutional refusal cannot override the statutory protections granted under the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019. He held that Sections 6 and 7 of the Act, which guarantee recognition of transgender identity and directives to update official documents, must be deemed incorporated into the rules, regulations, and bye-laws of all educational and professional establishments under Section 20 of the Act. The judge emphasized that no institution may deny transgender persons the right to update their name and gender under the pretext of lacking internal mechanisms.
Further, the bench clarified that intermediaries—such as universities or licensing bodies—do not need to await the issuance of corrected documents from original institutions (like earlier schools) before making updates themselves. Each establishment is independently obligated under Section 10 of the Act to act on the individual’s request and issue updated documentation.
In Dr. Laishram’s case, the Court directed the Board of Secondary Education Manipur, the Council of Higher Secondary Education Manipur, Manipur University, and the Manipur Medical Council to issue fresh certificates reflecting her new name and female gender within one month. Additionally, it instructed the state’s Chief Secretary to issue general directives ensuring that all establishments in Manipur comply with the statutory mandate for inclusion and recognition.
This ruling not only upheld Dr. Laishram's individual rights but also set a broader precedent for transgender rights in the region. It affirmed that self-identified gender needs legal recognition across administrative and educational processes, irrespective of institutional resistance. Significantly, the judgment reinforced that masculinities traversing normative boundaries must be afforded dignity and equality under both law and daily practice.
By affirming these principles, the Manipur High Court has taken a progressive step toward fulfilling the constitutional promise of equality and human dignity for transgender persons.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.