The Ernakulam Bar Association has recently approached the Kerala High Court with a plea for the publication of an interim report submitted by an Expert Committee led by Justice VK Mohanan. This report forms the foundation for proposed revisions to court fees, which were highlighted in the 2024 Kerala budget. The proposed changes include a 5% increase in court fees for cheque cases under the Negotiable Instruments Act and the introduction of court fees for Family Court petitions. The plea's primary contention is that the interim report, which is essential for informed public hearings and stakeholder feedback, has not been made available to the public or even published on the Law and Tax Department's website.
Background of the Plea
The plea submitted by the Ernakulam Bar Association underscores the need for transparency and public participation in the legislative process, especially when it involves amendments that affect the public directly. According to the plea, the Expert Committee had intended to gather opinions, suggestions, and statistics from various stakeholders, including the High Court Registry, statutory bodies, judicial and quasi-judicial authorities, representatives of the Bar Association, and lawyer organizations. However, the lack of publication of the interim report hinders these stakeholders from providing informed feedback.
Court Proceedings
Justice TR Ravi of the Kerala High Court has admitted the plea and questioned whether the interim report has been published. The court has sought instructions from the Government Pleader on the matter, requesting clarity on the publication status of the report and a copy if it has indeed been published. The court's decision to investigate the matter further reflects the judiciary's commitment to ensuring procedural transparency and accountability in the legislative process.
Arguments Presented
Ernakulam Bar Association’s Argument
The Bar Association argues that the interim report is crucial for effective participation in the public hearings and for rendering informed opinions. They emphasize that any report impacting the public, particularly one proposing a hike in court fees, should be readily accessible as per the Right to Information Act, 2005. The plea contends that the non-publication of the report, despite representations made to the Principal Secretary of the Law Department, is illegal and unwarranted. This lack of transparency, they argue, prevents the litigant public and their representatives from effectively participating in the public discourse surrounding the proposed fee revisions.
Legal Basis for the Plea
The plea highlights several legal and procedural grounds to support its demand for the report's publication. It references the Right to Information Act, 2005, arguing that the suppression of the interim report contravenes the principles of transparency and accountability enshrined in the Act. The plea asserts that the public authority's decision to withhold the report from citizens is not only unjustified but also detrimental to the democratic process of law-making, where public opinion plays a crucial role.
Impact of Proposed Fee Revisions
The proposed hike in court fees, if implemented, would have significant implications for the litigant public. A 5% increase in court fees for cheque cases and the introduction of fees for Family Court petitions could potentially deter individuals from seeking legal recourse, thereby affecting access to justice. The Ernakulam Bar Association, representing the interests of the legal fraternity and the public, argues that such changes should not be made without thorough public consultation and scrutiny of the interim report.
Court’s Direction
The Kerala High Court has directed the Government Pleader to provide information on whether the interim report has been published and to make a copy available if it has. This direction underscores the importance of procedural fairness and transparency in the process of amending laws that have a direct impact on the public. The court's intervention is a step towards ensuring that any legislative changes are made with due consideration of public opinion and stakeholder feedback.
Broader Implications
This case has broader implications for the process of law-making and public participation in India. The outcome of this plea could set a precedent for the mandatory publication of reports and documents that form the basis for legislative amendments, particularly those affecting the public directly. It highlights the critical role of transparency and accountability in governance and the need for public authorities to adhere to the principles of the Right to Information Act.
The Ernakulam Bar Association's plea also brings to light the challenges faced by legal professionals and the public in accessing crucial information required for informed participation in the legislative process. If the court rules in favor of the Bar Association, it could lead to more stringent enforcement of transparency norms and greater public involvement in the law-making process.
Conclusion
The Kerala High Court's decision to examine the publication status of the Expert Committee's interim report is a significant step towards ensuring transparency and accountability in the legislative process. The Ernakulam Bar Association's plea underscores the need for informed public participation and scrutiny in the process of amending laws that impact the public directly. As the case progresses, it will be essential to monitor the court's directions and the responses from the government authorities involved.
This case serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the principles of transparency and accountability in governance and ensuring that the public has access to crucial information required for meaningful participation in the legislative process. The outcome of this plea could have far-reaching implications for the process of law-making and public involvement in India.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.