Supreme Court Directs Retest for NEET UG 2024 Candidates Who Received Less Time

 

Introduction and Background

In a significant development concerning the NEET UG 2024 examination, the Central government informed the Supreme Court that candidates who received less than the allotted time during the exam will be permitted to retake it. This decision comes after numerous complaints regarding the arbitrary awarding of grace marks, which allegedly led to a substantial number of top scorers, raising concerns about malpractices and irregularities during the exam.

Court’s Directive and Committee Recommendations

The directive to allow a retest was influenced by recommendations from a committee meeting held on June 12. Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta recorded these recommendations in the court's order. The recommendations stipulated that the scorecards of the 1,563 affected candidates, which were issued on June 4, 2024, would be canceled and withdrawn. The affected candidates will be informed of their actual scores without compensatory marks, and a re-test will be conducted for them.

Options for Affected Candidates

Candidates affected by the time shortage have two options: they can either take the re-test or retain their original scores without the grace marks previously awarded. If they opt for the re-test, their original NEET score will be nullified, and the new score from the re-test will be considered. For those who choose not to take the re-test, their scores will be adjusted by removing the grace marks.

Schedule for Retest and Results

The National Testing Agency (NTA) announced that the retest for the 1,563 students will be held on June 23, with results to be declared by June 30. Following the declaration of the re-test results, medical college counseling is scheduled to begin on July 6.

Legal Proceedings and Petitions

The Supreme Court’s decision comes amidst various petitions challenging the conduct of the NEET UG 2024 examination. These petitions included demands to cancel the NEET results announced on June 4 due to the alleged malpractices and the improper awarding of grace marks. Advocate Kanu Aggarwal, representing the Central government, assured that the retest decision was made to address student concerns.

Concerns and Responses

Advocate J Sai Deepak, representing one of the petitioners, Alakh Pandey (founder of the test preparation startup PhysicsWallah), raised concerns about the fairness of the retest decision, pointing out that other affected students might not have approached the court. The bench, however, maintained that it could not extend the scope of the case to those not before the court. Nevertheless, the NTA was ordered to file a reply regarding allegations of unfair practices in the NEET exam by July 8, the next hearing date.

Government and Legal Representation

Senior Advocate Naresh Kaushik represented the NTA, affirming the organization’s commitment to ensuring a fair and transparent re-test process. The involvement of senior legal figures underscores the high stakes and the need for a meticulous approach to resolving the issues surrounding the NEET UG 2024 examination.

Implications for Future Exams

This case sets a precedent for how exam-related grievances, particularly those involving high-stakes tests like NEET, are addressed. The Supreme Court’s intervention highlights the importance of ensuring a fair testing environment and the need for rigorous mechanisms to handle discrepancies. The decision to allow a re-test rather than merely adjusting scores with grace marks emphasizes the judiciary’s role in maintaining the integrity of educational assessments.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s directive for a retest for NEET UG 2024 candidates who received less time during the exam represents a crucial step towards addressing the alleged irregularities and ensuring fairness in the examination process. This decision, involving the cancellation of grace marks and offering a re-test, aims to uphold the standards of the NEET examination and restore confidence among the candidates. As the legal proceedings continue, the outcomes will likely have lasting implications for the conduct and administration of competitive exams in India.

Court Practice Community

WhatsApp Group Invite

Join WhatsApp Community