The Delhi High Court has taken a significant stance against child sexual harassment, emphasizing the role of the judiciary in encouraging victims and their families to report crimes. This approach is seen as a critical step in reducing the stigma associated with such offenses and ensuring that cases are treated with utmost seriousness.
Judicial Observations and Impact: Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma underscored the detrimental effects of victim and family shaming on the willingness of real victims to report crimes. She noted that judicial pronouncements acknowledging the profound impact of voyeurism on victims and their families serve as a healing balm, aiding in their psychological recovery. The court highlighted that strict legal actions against perpetrators act as a deterrent, discouraging potential offenders by showing that the legal system is proactive and uncompromising in dealing with such crimes.
Case Background: The court's observations came while dismissing an appeal by a man challenging his conviction in a case involving voyeurism and sexual harassment of a minor. The man had been sentenced to three years of simple imprisonment. The case revealed the story of a minor who suffered harassment within her home by a member of the household staff. The court also pointed out the dangers posed by electronic devices, such as mobile phones, in the commission of such offenses.
Protection of Vulnerable Victims: Justice Sharma emphasized the paramount duty of the criminal justice system to protect vulnerable individuals, particularly children, from secondary trauma caused by unjust accusations or demeaning narratives. The court took a firm stand against any attempts to malign the character of child victims or use victim shaming as a legal strategy.
Potential Consequences and Judicial Responsibility: The court expressed concern over the potential misuse of videos recorded by the appellant, which could have had devastating effects on the child victim and her family. The judiciary's responsibility to prevent such outcomes was underscored, and the court noted that leniency in such cases would send a wrong message to society. Justice Sharma stressed the importance of ensuring that children are not forced to leave their homeland due to trauma caused by such offenses.
Conclusion: The Delhi High Court's decision reaffirms the judiciary's commitment to taking a firm stand against child sexual harassment. By doing so, the court aims to encourage victims and their families to come forward and report crimes, thereby reducing the stigma associated with seeking justice and ensuring the protection of vulnerable individuals from further trauma.
.jpeg)
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.