Supreme Court Rules on Prohibition of Granting Interest Upon Interest in Arbitration Awards

Introduction

On August 7, 2024, the Supreme Court of India delivered a pivotal ruling regarding the powers of arbitral tribunals and courts to grant interest upon interest in arbitration awards. This decision, emanating from a case involving M/s D. Khosla and Company versus the Union of India, clarifies the interpretation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, in relation to the awarding of compound interest.

Legal Framework and Background

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, governs arbitration proceedings in India, setting out the framework for arbitral awards and the powers of arbitral tribunals. One of the contentious issues in arbitration is whether an arbitral tribunal or court can award interest on interest, also known as compound interest. The Supreme Court’s judgment addresses this issue, interpreting the provisions of the Act in the context of the specific case presented.

The Case Details

The dispute involved an arbitral award where the arbitrator had granted interest for two distinct periods. The first period, from the date of completion of work to the date of the award, was awarded simple interest at the rate of 12% per annum. The second period, from the date of the award to the date of payment or the court decree, whichever was earlier, was awarded interest at 15% per annum. The key issue was whether the 15% interest awarded for the post-award period included the 12% pre-award interest component, effectively amounting to interest upon interest.

Court’s Interpretation

The Supreme Court, in its interpretation, held that neither the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, nor any other relevant statute, explicitly empowers arbitral tribunals or courts to grant interest upon interest. The bench comprising Justices PS Narasimha and Pankaj Mithal emphasized that courts are generally not supposed to grant compound interest unless explicitly provided by statute or stipulated in the contract terms. In this case, there was no such provision in the relevant statutes or the contract.

Detailed Analysis of Judgment

The judgment authored by Justice PS Narasimha elaborated on the legal principles governing the award of interest. The court pointed out that Section 29 of the Arbitration Act allows the court to order reasonable interest on the principal sum adjudged by the award. However, it does not permit interest on interest. The court clarified that the term "amount awarded" refers to the principal compensation amount, excluding any interest component from the pre-award period.

Examination of the Award

Upon examining the award, the court found that the arbitrator’s intention was not to grant compound interest. The award specified simple interest for the pre-award period and a higher rate of interest for the post-award period on the principal amount. The court stressed that awarding compound interest would require explicit authorization, which was absent in this case.

Implications of the Ruling

The Supreme Court’s decision has significant implications for arbitration practice in India. It establishes a clear precedent that arbitral tribunals and courts cannot grant compound interest unless explicitly authorized by statute or contract. This ruling ensures that awards remain within the legal framework and prevents the imposition of undue financial burdens on parties.

Reaction from Legal Fraternity

The ruling has been met with approval from legal experts who view it as a necessary clarification of the law. It reinforces the principle that arbitral tribunals must operate within the confines of the law and cannot extend their powers beyond what is explicitly provided. This decision is expected to bring greater predictability and consistency to arbitration awards concerning interest.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s ruling on the prohibition of granting interest upon interest in arbitration awards is a landmark decision that clarifies the legal boundaries within which arbitral tribunals and courts must operate. By reaffirming the principle that compound interest cannot be awarded without explicit authorization, the court has provided much-needed clarity and guidance for future arbitration proceedings. This judgment will have a lasting impact on arbitration practice in India, ensuring that awards remain fair and within the legal framework.

Court Practice Community

WhatsApp Group Invite

Join WhatsApp Community