Background: Defacement During Election Campaigns
The case arose from concerns over the widespread defacement of public property in Delhi during the DUSU election campaigns. As is common in student elections, campaigners often resort to excessive poster campaigns, graffiti, and banners to gain visibility. However, this practice leads to the defacement of walls, poles, and other public and private properties, resulting in a visual nuisance and environmental degradation.
A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed against this defacement, seeking the intervention of the court to address the issue. The petitioner argued that the unchecked defacement during elections violated municipal regulations and caused significant damage to public property, which the candidates should be held accountable for.
Court’s Stand on Maintaining Public Order
The Delhi High Court, while hearing the matter, took a balanced approach to protect both public property and the integrity of the electoral process. The court recognized the importance of the DUSU elections and their democratic significance. However, it also emphasized the necessity of maintaining public order and cleanliness during such events.
The bench, in its ruling, stated that while the elections were an essential part of student democracy, the defacement of public property could not be condoned. It noted that such acts were in violation of the Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007, which prohibits defacing any property by writing, painting, or pasting any material. The court made it clear that the rule of law must prevail, and candidates or political groups should not be allowed to violate laws under the guise of electioneering.
Cleanup as a Prerequisite for Counting Votes
In a significant directive, the court ordered that the counting of votes for the DUSU elections could proceed only after the defacement caused by the campaigns was cleaned up. The court tasked the authorities, including the Delhi University administration and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), with overseeing the cleanup efforts. It instructed that all posters, banners, and graffiti defacing public property be removed promptly.
The court’s decision highlighted the need for accountability in election campaigns. It emphasized that candidates and their supporters must take responsibility for ensuring that their campaign activities do not lead to public property damage. By linking the cleanup to the counting of votes, the court effectively used the electoral process as leverage to ensure that the cleanup was carried out swiftly.
Importance of Clean and Fair Elections
This judgment underscores the importance of clean and fair elections, not only in terms of preventing electoral malpractices but also in terms of environmental and public cleanliness. The court’s ruling sends a strong message to election candidates, campaigners, and authorities that the sanctity of the electoral process must go hand in hand with respect for public spaces and legal provisions.
The Delhi High Court’s decision also brings attention to the growing issue of defacement during elections, whether in student elections or larger political campaigns. It sets a precedent that election candidates can be held accountable for the actions of their supporters, particularly when it comes to the violation of laws designed to protect public spaces.
Impact of the Ruling
The immediate impact of the ruling is that the DUSU election vote counting will be delayed until the cleanup is completed, which is likely to spur swift action by the university and municipal authorities. Moreover, this ruling could have broader implications for future elections, including state and national-level campaigns, where defacement and environmental damage often become contentious issues.
The court’s decision reinforces the importance of civic responsibility during elections and is a step towards ensuring that public property is respected even during high-pressure electoral campaigns. It also sets a legal precedent that could encourage stricter enforcement of defacement laws across the country.
Conclusion
The Delhi High Court’s directive to delay the counting of votes for the DUSU elections until the defacement caused by the campaign is cleaned up serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining public order and cleanliness during election campaigns. By holding candidates accountable for the actions of their supporters and linking the cleanup to the electoral process, the court has set an important precedent for future elections. The ruling reinforces the principle that elections should be conducted responsibly, with respect for both the law and public spaces.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.