Himachal Pradesh HC Upholds Levy of GST on Mining Royalty Payable for Mining Concession Granted by State

 

Background of the Case:

The Himachal Pradesh High Court recently upheld the levy of Goods and Services Tax (GST) on the mining royalty payable to the state government for the grant of mining concessions. The petitioner, a mining company, challenged the imposition of GST on the royalty payments made to the state under mining concession agreements. The central issue revolved around whether such royalty payments, as part of a mining concession granted by the state, were liable to attract GST.

Key Legal Issues:

The petitioner contended that the royalty paid to the state government in exchange for the right to extract minerals from state-owned lands should not be subject to GST. The argument was based on the contention that the royalty is a statutory payment made under the terms of a mining lease or concession agreement, and not a consideration for the supply of goods or services. The petitioner thus argued that royalty payments were not "supply" as defined under the GST Act, and therefore, GST should not be levied on such payments.

The key issue, therefore, was whether the royalty payment made for the grant of a mining concession amounted to a "supply" under GST law, thereby making it liable for GST.

Court’s Analysis:

The Himachal Pradesh High Court examined the provisions of the GST Act, including the definition of "supply" under Section 7, which outlines the scope of what constitutes taxable supply of goods or services. The Court observed that the payment of royalty for the right to extract minerals falls within the category of "supply" as defined under the GST Act because it represents a consideration for the grant of a license or right to use the state's resources.

The Court relied on the legal understanding that the royalty payment is made in return for the right to extract and sell the minerals, which is a form of supply. The payment of royalty is linked to the economic benefit derived from the mining operations, and it constitutes a transaction for the supply of a license or right to mine minerals, which is a taxable service under GST.

Additionally, the Court referred to a circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), which clarified that royalty payments made for the right to extract minerals are indeed taxable under GST. The Court further noted that the GST on royalty payments was consistent with the objective of the GST regime to tax all supplies of goods and services, unless specifically exempted.

Court’s Conclusion:

In light of the legal provisions and the relevant CBIC circular, the Himachal Pradesh High Court upheld the imposition of GST on the mining royalty paid to the state government. The Court ruled that the royalty payments made by the petitioner were subject to GST as they qualified as a "supply" under the GST law.

Implications of the Ruling:

This judgment is significant because it clarifies that royalty payments made to state governments for the extraction of minerals are not exempt from GST. The ruling underscores the broad scope of GST, including payments for licenses or rights to extract and sell minerals. The decision could have far-reaching implications for the mining industry and other sectors where similar license or royalty payments are involved, as it reinforces the view that such payments are taxable under GST.

The Court’s judgment highlights the importance of adhering to the GST framework, ensuring that all taxable supplies, including those involving mining concessions, are duly taxed, thus ensuring compliance with India’s indirect tax regime.

Court Practice Community

WhatsApp Group Invite

Join WhatsApp Community