The Delhi High Court has temporarily halted the Bar Council of India's (BCI) decision to remove Advocate Sanjeev Nasiar from his position as Vice Chairman of the Bar Council of Delhi (BCD). The stay was issued pending an inquiry into allegations questioning the authenticity of Nasiar's law degree. The court's decision highlights procedural lapses in the BCI's actions and underscores the need for due process.
Background of the Dispute
Sanjeev Nasiar, a prominent legal professional and head of the AAP's legal cell, faced allegations that his LL.B. degree from Devi Ahilya Bai Vishwavidyalaya in Indore was forged. Despite confirmation from the university affirming its authenticity, the BCI raised concerns based on findings from its sub-committee. In response, the BCI referred the matter to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for further examination.
High Court's Intervention
Justice Sanjeev Narula granted an interim stay on the BCI's resolution to remove Nasiar, allowing him to retain his position until the case is reviewed on January 21, 2025. The court emphasized that procedural norms were violated, particularly Nasiar's lack of opportunity to respond. The BCI's counsel argued that the allegations warranted a thorough investigation, while Nasiar's legal team contended that the BCI overstepped its jurisdiction and undermined the BCD's autonomy.
Implications and Next Steps
The court has directed the CBI to defer action against Nasiar until due process is complete. This case raises critical questions about governance within the legal profession, balancing institutional integrity with individual rights.
The matter remains under judicial scrutiny, reflecting the broader debate on procedural fairness and professional accountability in India's legal system.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.