Background of the Case
The issue dates back to a 2018 public interest litigation concerning the proliferation of unauthorized advertisements, including flex boards, banners, and flags, across Kerala. These installations, often erected without official permission, posed safety hazards and contributed to visual pollution. In response, the High Court initiated a mission to clear public spaces of these unauthorized materials, directing local authorities to enforce compliance and impose fines on violators.
Recent Developments and Cyber Attacks
Despite the court's clear directives, compliance was inconsistent, leading to continued monitoring and enforcement. In December 2024, Justice Ramachandran noted significant progress in the removal of unauthorized installations. However, this progress was marred by cyber attacks and personal attacks directed at the judiciary, particularly targeting the presiding judge. These attacks were reportedly orchestrated by individuals claiming affiliation with political parties, aiming to intimidate and undermine the court's authority.
Court's Response to Cyber Attacks
During the proceedings, Justice Ramachandran issued a verbal warning to those perpetrating the attacks, stating that such individuals would be dealt with appropriately. He emphasized the court's commitment to its mission and its unwillingness to be swayed by intimidation tactics. The judge remarked, "Those people who believe that they can attack a Judge and get away... ask them to wait for their time. We will go behind them... I want the mission over first. Then we will decide how to deal with these foot soldiers."
Support for Local Authorities
The court also acknowledged reports that Secretaries of Local Self Government Institutions and field staff responsible for removing unauthorized boards faced threats and attacks. In response, the court reiterated its earlier directive for police protection to ensure the safety of officials executing its orders. This measure aims to bolster the enforcement of the court's directives and protect public servants from harassment or harm.
Implications of the Court's Stand
The Kerala High Court's firm stance against cyber attacks and intimidation underscores the judiciary's independence and its resolve to uphold the rule of law. By addressing these challenges head-on, the court reinforces the principle that judicial decisions must be respected and that attempts to undermine the judiciary through personal attacks will face serious consequences.
Conclusion
The ongoing efforts by the Kerala High Court to remove unauthorized flex boards and banners from public spaces highlight the judiciary's proactive role in maintaining public order and aesthetics. The court's response to cyber attacks against its judges further demonstrates its commitment to safeguarding judicial integrity and ensuring that lawful directives are implemented without obstruction or intimidation.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.