The Madhya Pradesh High Court is currently deliberating on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that seeks to enhance air connectivity to Jabalpur, a city of significant economic and strategic importance in central India. The PIL, filed by Nagrik Upbhokta Margdarshak Manch—a social activism organization—highlights the inadequate flight services to and from Jabalpur, despite substantial investments in airport infrastructure.
Background
Jabalpur hosts several key institutions, including three defense factories, five universities, notable pilgrimage sites like Bhedaghat, three national parks, and serves as the principal seat of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Recognizing the city's importance, approximately ₹500 crores have been invested in extending and developing the Dumna Airport to boost its capacity and facilities. However, the petitioners argue that, contrary to expectations, the number of flights operating from Jabalpur has declined, adversely affecting the region's connectivity and development.
Court Proceedings
During a hearing on December 17, 2024, the division bench comprising Chief Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Vivek Jain expressed concerns over the limited flight operations to Jabalpur. The court questioned Air India about the absence of flights to Jabalpur, especially when short flights like Delhi to Chandigarh are operational. Similarly, the court inquired why Indigo Airlines, known for its extensive network across India, including smaller destinations, has limited services to Jabalpur.
The court emphasized the need for increased connectivity to Jabalpur, noting the demand and the city's strategic significance. It directed respondents who had not yet filed their replies to the PIL—including the Union of India, Director General of Civil Aviation, Airport Director of Dumna Airport, Air India, Indigo, SpiceJet, and Akasa Airlines—to submit their responses within two weeks. Failure to comply would result in a penalty of ₹25,000 each, payable to the M.P. High Court Legal Services Authority.
Airlines' Responses
Indigo Airlines, represented by counsel during the hearing, acknowledged the court's directive to seek instructions on the matter. The counsel indicated that Indigo had filed a reply opposing the petition, suggesting that increasing flights to Jabalpur may not be commercially viable. The specifics of their opposition, however, were not detailed during the proceedings.
Implications for Jabalpur
The PIL underscores a critical issue affecting Jabalpur's growth and accessibility. Despite significant investments in airport infrastructure, the reduction in flight services hampers economic development, tourism, and the convenience of residents and visitors. The petitioners argue that while other cities like Indore, Bhopal, and Gwalior have seen new flight routes introduced, Jabalpur has been overlooked, leading to disparities in regional connectivity.
Judicial Intervention
The Madhya Pradesh High Court's involvement signifies the judiciary's recognition of the importance of equitable infrastructure development. By questioning major airlines and seeking prompt responses, the court aims to address potential neglect and ensure that Jabalpur receives the attention it warrants from both the government and private carriers.
Conclusion
The ongoing deliberations in the Madhya Pradesh High Court regarding the PIL for improved air connectivity to Jabalpur highlight a significant concern about regional development and accessibility. The court's proactive stance in questioning airlines and setting deadlines for responses reflects a commitment to addressing infrastructural disparities. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how infrastructural investments are matched with service provisions, ensuring that cities like Jabalpur are not left behind in the nation's aviation network.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.