In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has directed the Army Welfare Housing Organisation (AWHO) to demolish and reconstruct Towers B and C of the Chander Kunj Army Towers, citing severe structural deficiencies that pose risks to residents' safety. This decision underscores the judiciary's commitment to ensuring the well-being of armed forces personnel and their families by upholding stringent construction standards.
Background of the Chander Kunj Army Towers
The Chander Kunj Army Towers, located in Vytilla, Kochi, were developed by AWHO, a society dedicated to providing affordable housing for serving and retired army personnel, as well as widows of army members. The project comprises three towers—A, B, and C—encompassing a total of 264 dwelling units. Completed in 2018, the development aimed to offer quality housing to the armed forces community.
Residents' Complaints and Subsequent Investigations
Shortly after occupancy, residents of Towers B and C began reporting issues such as seepage, water leakage, and concerns regarding the buildings' structural stability. These complaints prompted the residents' association to seek redressal through various channels, including filing FIRs and lodging complaints with the Tripunithura Municipality and the District Collector-Disaster Management Authority.
In response to these concerns, the District Collector ordered a structural audit of the buildings. The audit, conducted by experts from the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras, revealed alarming findings. The study identified significant corrosion in the concrete, attributed to high chloride content, which compromised the structural integrity of Towers B and C. The report highlighted severe cracking and other structural defects, indicating that the buildings were unsafe for habitation.
Court's Findings and Directive
The Kerala High Court, upon reviewing the expert reports and considering the provisions of the Kerala Municipalities Act, 1994, the Kerala Municipality Building Rules 1999, and the Disaster Management Act, 2005, concluded that the distress to the towers was primarily human-induced. The court noted that the cumulative violations of regulatory, structural, and environmental standards had led to significant loss and suffering for the residents.
Justice Mohammed Nias C.P. emphasized the gravity of the situation, stating that continued occupation of the buildings posed grave risks to community safety. He remarked, "The distress to the towers is undeniably human-induced, causing significant loss and suffering due to cumulative violations of regulatory, structural, and environmental standards." The court further observed that immediate evacuation was necessary to prevent potential casualties and protect lives and properties.
Consequently, the court directed AWHO to demolish and reconstruct Towers B and C, ensuring that the new structures adhere to all applicable safety and construction standards. Additionally, the court mandated the District Collector to constitute a committee of experts to oversee the demolition and reconstruction process, ensuring proper implementation and compliance with safety norms.
Implications of the Ruling
This ruling has significant implications for housing projects intended for armed forces personnel. It underscores the necessity for rigorous adherence to construction standards and the importance of regular structural assessments to ensure the safety of residents. The court's decision also highlights the role of judicial oversight in holding responsible parties accountable for lapses that endanger public safety.
Furthermore, the directive for the formation of an expert committee to supervise the reconstruction process reflects a proactive approach to ensuring that the new structures meet the required safety standards. This measure aims to restore the confidence of the residents and the broader armed forces community in the housing projects provided by AWHO.
Conclusion
The Kerala High Court's intervention in the Chander Kunj Army Towers case serves as a critical reminder of the paramount importance of safety and quality in housing developments, especially those intended for the armed forces community. By mandating the demolition and reconstruction of the affected towers, the court has taken a decisive step to rectify the structural deficiencies and safeguard the lives of the residents. This case underscores the judiciary's role in upholding public safety and ensuring that housing projects meet the highest standards of construction and safety.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.