In a significant legal development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has imposed a fine of $10,000 on an individual who absconded to the United States to evade trial in a fraud case that has been pending for nearly two decades. The court's decision underscores the judiciary's intolerance towards attempts to undermine the legal process.
Background of the Case
The accused, Avtar Singh Pannu, was implicated in a First Information Report (FIR) registered in 2004 under Sections 419, 420, 468, and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, along with Section 12 of the Passport Act, 1967. Following his arrest that same year, Pannu was granted bail. However, he subsequently left for the USA and failed to participate in the ongoing legal proceedings. This absence led to the cancellation of his bail and surety bonds in 2004, and by 2006, he was officially declared a proclaimed offender.
Legal Proceedings and Defense Argument
Representing Pannu, his counsel argued that the accused was unaware of the legal actions against him due to his residence in the USA and the lack of summons served to him there. The defense assured the court of Pannu's willingness to surrender and actively engage in the trial without further delays.
Court's Observations
Justice Sandeep Moudgil, presiding over the case, emphasized that Pannu was cognizant of the charges against him prior to his departure from India. The judge criticized Pannu's deliberate evasion of the legal process for almost 20 years, labeling it as a significant affront to the judicial system. The court highlighted the prejudice caused to the opposing party and the undue delay inflicted upon the trial proceedings due to Pannu's actions.
Imposition of Fine and Conditions for Bail
To address the delay and its repercussions, the court mandated that Pannu deposit a fine of $10,000 with the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Clerks Association. The court stipulated that upon presenting the receipt of this payment to the trial court, Pannu's bail application would be considered and decided on the same day. This measure aims to compensate for the prolonged delay and serves as a deterrent against future attempts to evade legal proceedings.
Conclusion
This ruling by the Punjab and Haryana High Court sends a clear message about the judiciary's stance against individuals who attempt to circumvent the legal system. By imposing a substantial fine and setting strict conditions for bail, the court reinforces the principle that evading justice will result in significant consequences.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.