In a significant judgment, the Jodhpur bench of the Rajasthan High Court quashed criminal proceedings that had been pending for 23 years under the Forest Conservation Act and the Rajasthan Forest Act. The case, initiated in 2002, involved allegations against Public Works Department (PWD) officials and contractors for unauthorized tree felling during road construction in a protected forest area. Justice Farjand Ali presided over the matter, emphasizing that the prolonged delay violated the accused's fundamental right to a speedy trial as enshrined in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
Background of the Case
The origins of the case trace back to 2002 when the Forest Department filed complaints alleging that the PWD had commenced road construction in a protected forest division without obtaining the requisite permissions. The construction activities purportedly led to the felling of legally protected trees. Due to the absence of direct witnesses to the tree-cutting activities, a broad spectrum of individuals—including laborers, contractors, and PWD officers—were implicated as accused. Over the years, the case saw several accused passing away, some remaining unserved, and others awaiting the commencement of the trial.
Observations by the Court
Justice Ali highlighted the undue hardship faced by the accused due to the protracted nature of the proceedings. He noted that the accused had to attend court on numerous occasions without any substantive progress in the trial, primarily because of delays in serving notices to other accused parties. The judge remarked:
"The legal trajectory mentioned above is sufficient enough to say that present is a case of glaring example of agony of an accused who got to attend the Court proceeding on each date of hearing with no progress in the trial, owing to the reason of adjournment for want of service upon the other accused and of course for none of his fault."
The court further observed that there was no direct evidence linking the accused to the actual act of tree felling or to any orders directing such actions. This lack of concrete evidence, combined with the extensive delay, rendered the continuation of the trial unjust.
Legal Implications
This judgment underscores the judiciary's commitment to upholding the fundamental rights of individuals, particularly the right to a speedy trial. The prolonged pendency of criminal cases not only exacerbates the suffering of the accused but also undermines the efficacy of the legal system. By quashing the proceedings, the Rajasthan High Court has reinforced the principle that justice delayed is justice denied.
The case also highlights the necessity for effective inter-departmental coordination within government agencies. Justice Ali pointed out the apparent lack of communication between the PWD and the Forest Department, which contributed to the initiation of the case. He questioned:
"Why the State Government didn't take care of coordination between their different departments."
Conclusion
The quashing of these decades-old criminal proceedings serves as a reminder of the judiciary's role in safeguarding individual rights against systemic inefficiencies. It calls for introspection within governmental departments to ensure that administrative oversights do not lead to unwarranted legal actions, thereby protecting citizens from undue harassment and upholding the sanctity of the legal process.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.