The Gujarat High Court has recently intensified its efforts to combat noise pollution, a pervasive issue affecting urban and rural areas alike. Recognizing the detrimental impacts of excessive noise on public health and well-being, the court has issued a series of directives aimed at enforcing existing regulations and ensuring compliance among stakeholders.
In a notable development, the High Court addressed the persistent problem of noise pollution emanating from DJ trucks commonly used during wedding processions and religious events. These vehicles, often modified without proper authorization, are equipped with powerful sound systems that frequently exceed permissible decibel levels, causing significant disturbances to communities. The court expressed concern over the lack of stringent enforcement against such violations, highlighting that despite numerous complaints, minimal action had been taken by authorities.
To tackle this issue, the court mandated the installation of sound limiters in all sound systems and public address systems. This directive aligns with the Gujarat Pollution Control Board's (GPCB) notification from December 3, 2019, which requires manufacturers and sellers to equip sound systems with devices that cap noise output at legally acceptable levels. The court emphasized the necessity of enforcing this notification, instructing the Additional Chief Secretary of the Home Department and the Member Secretary of the GPCB to submit affidavits detailing the measures implemented to ensure compliance.
Furthermore, the court expanded the scope of its inquiry beyond Ahmedabad, seeking information on actions taken across the entire state. This includes data on the number of offenders apprehended and the enforcement strategies employed by various authorities, such as the police, municipal bodies, and panchayats. The aim is to assess the effectiveness of current measures and identify areas requiring improvement to mitigate noise pollution comprehensively.
The court also addressed the issue of unauthorized modifications of vehicles into DJ trucks without the requisite permissions from the Regional Transport Office (RTO). Such modifications not only contribute to noise pollution but also pose safety risks. The court underscored the responsibility of municipal corporations and police departments to monitor and regulate these alterations, ensuring adherence to legal standards.
In its deliberations, the court acknowledged the challenges faced by law enforcement in managing noise pollution, particularly during festive seasons and public celebrations. However, it stressed the importance of proactive measures, such as issuing public notices to raise awareness about noise pollution regulations ahead of events likely to generate high noise levels. The court also advocated for on-the-spot action against violators to serve as a deterrent and promote compliance.
The judiciary's proactive stance reflects a broader recognition of the adverse effects of noise pollution on public health, including stress, sleep disturbances, and cardiovascular issues. By enforcing regulations and promoting the use of sound limiters, the court aims to create a more harmonious environment, balancing the enjoyment of cultural and social events with the right to a peaceful living space.
In conclusion, the Gujarat High Court's recent directives signify a robust approach to curbing noise pollution. Through strict enforcement of existing regulations, mandatory installation of sound limiters, and accountability measures for authorities, the court seeks to protect public health and ensure a tranquil environment for all residents.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.