The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has recently approved updated model guidelines aimed at enhancing the procedures for recording evidence from vulnerable witnesses within the Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. This initiative aligns with directives from the Supreme Court of India and incorporates best practices from other jurisdictions to ensure a supportive environment for such witnesses during legal proceedings.
Background and Necessity for Updated Guidelines
The legal system often encounters witnesses who, due to various factors, are considered vulnerable. These factors include age, mental or physical disabilities, the nature of the crime (such as sexual assault or domestic violence), and threats or fears related to testifying. Recognizing these challenges, the Supreme Court of India, in the case of Smruti Tukaram Badade v. State of Maharashtra, issued directives emphasizing the need for special procedures to protect and assist vulnerable witnesses. In compliance, the Jammu and Kashmir High Court has tailored its guidelines to address the unique needs of these individuals, ensuring they can provide testimony without intimidation or distress.
Definition and Scope of Vulnerability
The guidelines adopt a broad definition of "vulnerable witnesses," encompassing not only children but also:
Victims of sexual assault (irrespective of age or gender).
Individuals with mental illnesses as defined under relevant healthcare laws.
Persons with speech or hearing impairments.
Any individual deemed vulnerable by the presiding court due to specific circumstances.
This inclusive approach ensures that a wide array of individuals who might face challenges in standard courtroom settings receive the necessary support and protection.
Objectives of the Guidelines
The primary goals of these guidelines are:
Facilitating Testimony: Creating an environment where vulnerable witnesses can testify freely and truthfully without fear or discomfort.
Minimizing Secondary Victimization: Reducing additional trauma that might arise from participating in the judicial process.
Ensuring Fairness: Balancing the rights of the accused with the need to protect vulnerable witnesses, thereby upholding the integrity of the justice system.
Key Provisions and Protective Measures
To achieve these objectives, the guidelines introduce several measures:
Pre-Trial Familiarization: Vulnerable witnesses are allowed to visit the courtroom before the trial to become acquainted with the environment, reducing anxiety associated with unfamiliar settings.
Legal Assistance: Courts are mandated to provide legal support to vulnerable witnesses, ensuring they understand the proceedings and their role within them.
Comfortable Environment: During testimony, courts must ensure that the environment is accommodating, which may include modifications to the courtroom setup.
Confidentiality: Records and identities of vulnerable witnesses are to be kept confidential to protect them from potential harm or societal stigma.
Protective Measures: If a witness's safety is at risk, the court can implement measures such as preventing direct contact between the witness and the accused, ensuring the witness's security throughout the legal process.
Establishment of Vulnerable Witness Deposition Centres (VWDCs)
A cornerstone of the guidelines is the establishment of Vulnerable Witness Deposition Centres. These centres are designed to provide a safe and supportive environment for vulnerable witnesses to give their testimony. Features of VWDCs include separate entry and exit points to prevent contact with the accused, child-friendly settings for younger witnesses, and technological aids to facilitate testimony without the need for physical presence in the courtroom. The Supreme Court has directed that each High Court should set up at least two such centres within their jurisdiction, with the aim of expanding this initiative based on the specific needs of each state.
Training and Sensitization of Stakeholders
Implementing these guidelines effectively requires that all stakeholders—judges, lawyers, court staff, and law enforcement officers—are adequately trained and sensitized to the needs of vulnerable witnesses. The guidelines emphasize the importance of regular training programs to ensure that these individuals can interact with vulnerable witnesses appropriately, thereby reducing the risk of secondary victimization and ensuring the collection of accurate testimonies. The Supreme Court has constituted a committee chaired by Justice Gita Mittal to design and implement an all-India VWDC training program, underscoring the importance of specialized training in this area.
Balancing Rights: Fair Trial and Witness Protection
A critical aspect of the guidelines is the balance between protecting vulnerable witnesses and ensuring the accused's right to a fair trial. While the guidelines introduce measures to support and protect witnesses, they also ensure that these measures do not prejudice the accused's defense. For instance, while vulnerable witnesses may testify from a separate room or behind a screen to avoid direct confrontation, the defense retains the right to cross-examine the witness, preserving the adversarial nature of the proceedings.
Implementation and Monitoring
The success of these guidelines hinges on effective implementation and continuous monitoring. The High Court has mandated the establishment of committees to oversee the setup and functioning of VWDCs, ensure compliance with the guidelines, and address any challenges that arise during implementation. Regular audits and feedback mechanisms are also proposed to assess the effectiveness of the measures and make necessary adjustments.
Conclusion
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court's approval of updated guidelines for recording evidence from vulnerable witnesses marks a significant step toward a more inclusive and sensitive judicial process. By recognizing the unique challenges faced by vulnerable witnesses and instituting measures to address these challenges, the judiciary aims to uphold the principles of justice while ensuring the dignity and protection of all individuals involved. These guidelines not only align with national directives but also reflect a commitment to international standards and best practices in witness protection.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.