In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has intervened to protect the interests of students from the National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS) who were excluded from the Joint Entrance Examination (JEE) Mains 2025 counselling process due to delays in the declaration of their Class XII results. Justice Vikas Mahajan, while acknowledging the challenges faced by these students, emphasized the need for coordination between educational boards and counselling bodies to ensure that deserving candidates are not disadvantaged due to procedural delays.
The petitioners, all NIOS students, had diligently prepared for the JEE Mains examination over several years. Despite their commendable performance, their exclusion from the counselling process was attributed to the non-declaration of their Class XII results by NIOS within the stipulated time frame. This situation raised concerns about the fairness of the admission process, especially when students from other boards, who had their results declared on time, were allowed to participate in the counselling.
Justice Mahajan observed that these students had invested significant time and effort into their preparations and should not be penalized for delays beyond their control. He noted that the counselling bodies must take into account such delays and make provisions to accommodate affected students. The court highlighted that bodies like JoSAA had previously considered such delays when informed by the boards in advance, setting a precedent for flexibility in the admission process.
To address the immediate issue, the court directed NIOS to expedite the declaration of the Class XII results, aiming for a release date on or before June 17. This would provide a brief window for the affected students to register for the counselling process scheduled for June 19. The court further instructed the Joint Admission Council (JAC) to allow these students to register for the counselling on June 2, with the condition that seat allotment would occur only if they could furnish their results before the first round of seat allotment.
In cases where the results were not declared by June 19, the court mandated that JAC permit the students to register without the results, provided they could submit them before the second round of seat allotment. Additionally, the court directed JAC to notify other similarly situated candidates about this provision, ensuring that all affected students had an opportunity to participate in the counselling process.
This intervention by the Delhi High Court underscores the judiciary's commitment to ensuring that procedural delays do not hinder the educational aspirations of students. It also highlights the importance of coordination between educational boards and counselling bodies to create a fair and inclusive admission process. While the court's decision was based on the specific circumstances of the case and was not intended to set a precedent, it serves as a reminder of the need for flexibility and understanding in the face of unforeseen delays.
In conclusion, the Delhi High Court's ruling provides a much-needed respite for NIOS students aspiring to pursue engineering through JEE Mains. By ensuring their inclusion in the counselling process, the court has reinforced the principle that no student should be deprived of opportunities due to systemic delays, thereby upholding the right to education and fair treatment for all.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.