In a significant development, the Kerala High Court recently addressed a petition seeking the verification of criminal backgrounds and identities of migrant workers arriving in the state. The petition, filed under Writ Petition (C) No. 25674 of 2024 by TGN Kumar, raised concerns about the influx of migrant workers, particularly from West Bengal, allegedly involved in criminal activities and entering Kerala with fabricated identity documents. The petitioner contended that approximately 2.5 lakh unregistered migrant workers were residing in the state, posing potential security risks.
The Division Bench, comprising Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji, examined the petition and questioned the basis of the allegations. The petitioner's counsel cited newspaper reports and a letter written by the petitioner as sources of information. In response, the court directed the State Government to investigate the matter, emphasizing that such concerns should be addressed by the concerned Secretary of the State Government. The court observed that the appropriate course of action would be for the Secretary to look into the issue and take necessary steps as deemed appropriate.
This decision underscores the judiciary's approach to matters involving public policy and administrative functions. The court refrained from issuing directives and instead entrusted the State Government with the responsibility to assess and address the concerns raised in the petition. This approach aligns with the principle of separation of powers, where the judiciary refrains from interfering in matters that fall within the executive's domain unless there is a clear violation of constitutional rights or statutory provisions.
The petition highlighted several issues, including the alleged involvement of migrant workers in criminal activities such as counterfeit currency circulation and the absence of a mechanism to track unregistered workers. The petitioner suggested that the government should initiate steps to identify migrant workers with criminal antecedents, detect those with fabricated identity cards, and establish a system to monitor their presence and activities within the state.
In response to these concerns, the court directed the Government Pleader to obtain instructions from the Local Self Government Department regarding the existence of a mechanism to ascertain the number of occupants in residential buildings where migrant workers reside. This directive indicates the court's recognition of the need for effective monitoring systems to ensure the safety and security of all residents, including migrant workers.
The Kerala government's response to the court's directions will be pivotal in shaping the future course of action. The government's approach to balancing security concerns with the rights of migrant workers will be closely scrutinized. It is essential that any measures implemented respect the constitutional rights of individuals, including the right to privacy and the freedom to reside and work in any part of the country.
This case also brings to light the broader issues surrounding the treatment of migrant workers in Kerala. While the state has benefited economically from the contributions of migrant workers, there have been instances where these workers have been subjected to scrutiny and suspicion. It is crucial to differentiate between genuine concerns about security and the potential for stigmatization of an entire community based on the actions of a few individuals.
The Kerala High Court's decision serves as a reminder of the delicate balance that must be maintained between ensuring public safety and upholding the rights of individuals. It also highlights the importance of relying on credible and verifiable information when making allegations that can impact the lives of a significant number of people.
In conclusion, while the court has disposed of the petition, the issues raised remain pertinent. The Kerala government must take proactive steps to address the concerns related to migrant workers, ensuring that any measures implemented are fair, transparent, and in line with constitutional principles. The state's approach will set a precedent for how similar issues are handled in the future, not only in Kerala but also in other states facing similar challenges.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.