The Delhi High Court has instructed the Delhi Police and excise authorities to conduct weekly inspections of bars and pubs, particularly in areas like Humayunpur Village in Safdarjung Enclave, to curb illegal operations. The court noted that despite reports claiming no liquor was being served, the public advertisements and activities of these establishments indicated otherwise. The bench, led by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Mini Pushkarna, expressed disbelief at the authorities’ failure to detect violations, questioning the credibility of their inspections.
In response to a plea seeking action against unlicensed pubs and bars creating nuisance in residential areas, the court emphasized the need for inspections during active business hours, especially in the evenings. Authorities were directed to file advance status reports in upcoming hearings to ensure accountability and continuity in enforcement. The court also stressed that these operations must align with licensing norms and not disturb public peace.
Additionally, the court struck down an order issued by the Delhi Police Licensing Unit against Uncultured Café and Bar for being unsigned and undated. This procedural lapse rendered the order invalid. The court reiterated that all actions against businesses must follow proper legal procedure and that arbitrary or informal orders could not be enforced.
In a separate case involving Hauz Khas Social, the court allowed the establishment to resume serving alcohol after the Excise Department had earlier halted operations due to a pending eating house license renewal. The court clarified that under the 2023 regulations, a license remains valid unless formally denied. It deemed the department’s action “misconceived” and instructed the police licensing unit to decide on the pending application within two weeks.
The court’s rulings reflect a dual approach: strict action against unlicensed establishments operating in violation of the law and protection for legitimate businesses from arbitrary administrative decisions. This ensures both the maintenance of public order in residential zones and the safeguarding of procedural fairness. The judgment underlines that enforcement must be systematic, evidence-based, and aligned with due process. Through these directions, the court aims to balance effective regulation with respect for individual and business rights under the law.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.