The Supreme Court has voiced deep concern over the growing trade in illicit narcotic substances and the escalating drug abuse among young people, highlighting that the expanding network of drug trafficking and addiction seriously threatens India’s youth. The Court, in a recent ruling, underscored that the web of drug trade “cannot be allowed to dim the glow of India’s youth,” pointing out that the growing availability of narcotics, particularly across national borders, makes the problem more dangerous and widespread. It emphasised that parents, educational institutions, and wider communities must be alert and proactive to counter the threat, urging that the issue must be treated not just as a crime but as a social and rehabilitative challenge.
Referring to a government report, the Court noted that almost 22.6 million people in India are users of narcotic drugs, cutting across all demographic groups, though adult men are most affected. The Court observed that after alcohol, cannabis and other drugs constitute the most commonly used substances, with a significant portion of the population reporting use of illegal variants. Alarmingly, the report highlighted that over 7 million individuals in India fall into the category of “problematic opioid users,” defined as those whose drug use has become dependent or harmful. These users are spread across various states, including Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Delhi, Andhra Pradesh, West Bengal, Rajasthan, and Odisha.
The Court linked this surge in substance abuse to easier access to drugs and various social and psychological pressures. Peer pressure, academic stress, emotional instability, and insufficient parental care were identified as major contributing factors. It noted that the youth, under pressure to succeed and lacking adequate emotional support, are particularly vulnerable to imitating addicts or succumbing to peer influence. The Court cautioned against romanticising drug use, remarking that young people should resist the impulse to emulate those who use narcotics and instead exercise autonomy in their decision-making.
Moreover, the Court emphasized that those who fall into addiction should not be viewed through a lens of moral judgment but rather as individuals needing help. It called for a shift in societal perspective: addiction should no longer be stigmatized, but addressed through rehabilitation and empathetic support. In this context, the Court talked about the critical role of families, urging parents to communicate openly, spend time with their children, and provide a stable emotional environment. It warned against parents treating drugs as a taboo subject, instead encouraging honest conversations that make children feel safe to discuss their struggles without fear.
Educational institutions, the Court held, must play a proactive role by incorporating drug-awareness programs into curricula. Schools and colleges should teach students about the physical, emotional, and legal consequences of narcotic use, backed by scientific research and real-life experience. The Court urged the government and social organisations to design national action plans and community-based initiatives that emphasize prevention, education, and early intervention.
Community groups, non-governmental organisations, and local stakeholders were also called upon to join hands in creating awareness campaigns. These campaigns should target youth centres, schools, and local communities, providing peer support education, outreach programs, and safe spaces for vulnerable youth. The Court underscored that community engagement is essential for building a meaningful support system that can help prevent substance dependence and intervene early where needed.
Addressing government institutions, the Court recommended that bodies like legal aid organisations and enforcement agencies, including the Narcotics Control Bureau, be more closely aligned with social services and youth-centric interventions. It encouraged collaboration between these agencies to build a coordinated response — combining legal enforcement, rehabilitation, and social care — to tackle the drug menace.
Ultimately, the Supreme Court’s warning was stark and urgent: the increasing trade in drugs and the rising trend of addiction among young Indians demands immediate, collective, and compassionate action. The Court made clear that while law enforcement has a role, the solution must be broader — rooted in education, family support, community outreach, and rehabilitation — if society is to protect its youth from the devastating consequences of substance abuse.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.