Calcutta High Court Reinstates Bimal Gurung as Accused in Murder Case

 

Overview

The Calcutta High Court has reinstated Gorkha Janamukti Morcha (GJM) leader Bimal Gurung as an accused in the 2010 murder of All India Gorkha League leader Madan Tamang. The decision overturned a lower court’s ruling that had discharged Gurung due to insufficient evidence presented by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

Case Background

Madan Tamang was killed on May 21, 2010, shortly before he was to address a public meeting in Darjeeling. This meeting was anticipated to disclose significant information about the politics surrounding the demand for a separate Gorkhaland state. The Gurung-led GJM was at the forefront of this political movement, and Tamang had publicly criticized the GJM's commitment to the statehood cause, accusing them of settling for an autonomous council instead.

Initial Investigations

The initial investigation was conducted by the Criminal Investigation Department (CID). However, after Nicol Tamang, a prime suspect and member of the GJM, escaped from CID custody, the case was transferred to the CBI. In May 2015, the CBI filed a chargesheet accusing Gurung and 47 others, including prominent figures like his wife Asha Gurung, Roshan Giri, and Binay Tamang, of involvement in the murder.

Lower Court Decision

In 2017, a lower court dropped charges against Gurung, stating that the CBI had not provided sufficient evidence linking him to the crime. This decision prompted Madan Tamang’s widow, Bharati Tamang, along with the CBI, to file a revision petition in the Calcutta High Court challenging the lower court's ruling.

High Court Ruling

Justice Subhendu Samanta of the Calcutta High Court ruled that there was sufficient evidence to implicate Gurung in the murder, particularly based on witness statements that directly linked him to the crime. The court noted that it was impermissible to discharge an accused when such direct allegations were made. Justice Samanta pointed out that the lower court had erred in segregating Gurung from other accused individuals despite similar evidence against them.

The court also dismissed the argument that the absence of Gurung's call data records (CDR) could exonerate him, stating that the direct allegations of criminal conspiracy were sufficient to maintain charges. The High Court emphasized that while the trial would ultimately determine the extent of Gurung's involvement, there was enough suspicion to warrant a thorough investigation and trial.

Implications and Future Proceedings

The reinstatement of charges against Gurung signifies a critical development in the long-standing case, underscoring the judiciary's role in ensuring thorough and unbiased investigations in politically sensitive cases. The ruling directs the lower court to proceed with framing charges against Gurung, thereby ensuring that all accused individuals, regardless of their political stature, face due legal scrutiny.

Legal Representation

Bharati Tamang was represented by advocates Kaushik Gupta, Arnab Mukherjee, and Shreyasi Manna. The CBI's legal team included advocate Anirban Mitra, while the respondents were represented by advocates Sayan De, Kaustn Shome, Rimik Chakraborty, and Sayan Kanjilal.

Conclusion

The Calcutta High Court's decision to reinstate Bimal Gurung as an accused in the Madan Tamang murder case reflects the judiciary's commitment to ensuring justice in high-profile cases. By recognizing the sufficiency of witness testimonies and the broader implications of political crimes, the court has reinforced the principle that legal processes must be followed rigorously, ensuring that no accused individual is prematurely exonerated without a comprehensive examination of evidence.

This ruling is likely to have significant repercussions on the political landscape in Darjeeling and the ongoing quest for Gorkhaland, reiterating the importance of accountability and transparency in addressing serious criminal allegations. 

Court Practice Community

WhatsApp Group Invite

Join WhatsApp Community