The extension highlights the importance of maintaining continuity in the judiciary while awaiting necessary procedural inputs from state authorities. The delay in conveying the views of the Chief Minister and the Governor led the Department of Justice to invoke Para 14 of the Memorandum of Procedure. This procedural step is taken when state authorities do not provide their input within the specified time, thereby indicating that they have no additional information to offer. This step allowed the Supreme Court Collegium to proceed with their recommendation based on available material.
To ensure the suitability of the judges for permanent positions, the Supreme Court Collegium undertook a comprehensive review process. They consulted judges familiar with the work of the additional judges and meticulously reviewed their judgments. This detailed assessment ensured that the merit and suitability of each judge were thoroughly evaluated. The decision to extend the tenure of these judges as additional judges for one year starting August 31, 2024, reflects the Collegium's commitment to maintaining the quality and stability of judicial appointments.
The recommended extension underscores the procedural diligence of the Supreme Court Collegium. It demonstrates the importance of timely feedback from state constitutional authorities in the appointment process. The extension also ensures that the Calcutta High Court continues to function smoothly, without disruptions, while the process of permanent appointments is finalized. This move is crucial for maintaining the judiciary's efficiency and effectiveness, as it allows for a thorough evaluation process without compromising the court's functioning.
The decision to extend the tenure of these judges is a significant step in maintaining judicial stability and ensuring the continued administration of justice. It highlights the collaborative effort required between the judiciary and the state authorities in the appointment process. The procedural steps taken by the Supreme Court Collegium reflect their commitment to transparency and thoroughness in judicial appointments.
In conclusion, the one-year extension of tenure for the nine additional judges of the Calcutta High Court, recommended by the Supreme Court Collegium, is a crucial decision aimed at maintaining judicial stability and ensuring the smooth functioning of the court. This decision highlights the importance of timely procedural inputs from state authorities and the thorough evaluation process undertaken by the Collegium. The extension ensures continuity and stability within the Calcutta High Court while the process of permanent appointments is finalized.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.