In a recent legal development, the Bombay High Court dismissed petitions filed by several gaushalas (cow shelters) seeking custody of cattle confiscated during illegal transportation operations. The court emphasized that such custody should be granted only when it serves the animals' best interests, not merely to accommodate the shelters' requests.
The gaushalas had approached the court after authorities seized cattle being transported without proper documentation, alleging violations of animal welfare laws. They contended that, as registered cow shelters, they were best suited to care for the confiscated animals and sought interim custody pending the outcome of legal proceedings.
However, the court scrutinized the credentials and facilities of the petitioning gaushalas. It found that some lacked the necessary infrastructure and resources to provide adequate care for a large number of cattle. The court also noted instances where gaushalas had previously failed to maintain proper records or had been involved in irregularities concerning animal care.
In its judgment, the court underscored the paramount importance of animal welfare, stating that the primary consideration in granting custody should be the well-being of the animals rather than the status of the applicant as a gaushala. The court directed authorities to ensure that the seized cattle are housed in facilities equipped to meet their needs, pending the resolution of the legal cases against those involved in the illegal transportation.
This ruling highlights the judiciary's commitment to upholding animal welfare standards and ensuring that custody decisions prioritize the best interests of the animals involved. It also serves as a reminder to cow shelters and similar organizations of the necessity to maintain proper facilities and adhere to legal and ethical standards in animal care.
0 Comments
Thank you for your response. It will help us to improve in the future.